EPD standards update: Construction PCR 2.0, decoded
If your next submittal leans on the old construction PCR, the clock is ticking. Version 2.0 reshapes structure, raises the bar on data quality, and nudges teams toward digital EPDs. Here is what changed, what dates matter, and how to avoid a scramble during verification.
What actually changed in PCR 2019:14
Version 2.0 introduces a standardized EPD structure, explicit data quality assessment and declaration, and market based modelling for biogas. It also aligns with GPI 5.0.1, ECO Platform updates from late 2024, and EN 15941 for data quality. The PCR is valid until April 7, 2030, with a small editorial update labeled 2.0.1 published June 5, 2025 ( EPD International, 2025 ).
Transition dates that affect your schedule
The prior version 1.3.4 was set to sunset on June 20, 2025. During the run up, the publication window at the operator stretched from the typical 1 to 3 days to as much as 10 working days to handle volume spikes ( EPD International, 2025 ). If your verification was done on 1.3.4 before the sunset, publication could proceed in that extended window. After the sunset, new EPDs must follow version 2.0.
Does this kill your current EPDs
No. Published EPDs retain their original validity. The operator also requires an internal follow up at least once per year during the five year validity so results stay up to date, and that may trigger an update if numbers shift materially (EPD International, 2025). EPD process certifications can now be issued with five year validity when paired with mandatory annual audits, which is important if your portfolio relies on a certified process path for speed (EPD International, 2025).
Why the structure and data rules matter commercially
Templates are now less freestyle and more like a well marked airport security line. Reviewers move faster, and buyers can compare products with less friction. Cleaner data quality declarations mean fewer clarifying emails during bids. Time is margin in construction, and anything that reduces verification back and forth tends to pay back quickly.
Win A $50 Amazon Gift Card in One Click!
Enter weekly raffle in one click • Help us get to know our readers and improve!
Digital EPDs are no longer theory
The operator reported 62 fully digital EPDs published as of May 20, 2025. That volume is small but real, and it points to a future where machine readable product data flows straight into specification software and takeoffs, not just a PDF tucked in a folder ( EPD International, 2025 ). If your product line repeats the same LCA model with small tweaks, going digital can shave days off reviews once the pipeline is set up.
Knock on effects in ratings and procurement
LEED v5 moved through member ratification on March 28, 2025, with a sharper decarbonization focus. That keeps pressure on embodied carbon transparency and verified, product specific EPDs in submittals for competitive projects in North America (USGBC, 2025). Teams that show current EPDs avoid penalty assumptions that push them out of consideration even when pricing is sharp.
What your verification partner will ask for next
Expect tighter checks on data quality scoring, clearer energy sourcing evidence, and careful treatment of market based biogas. Electricity instruments can no longer be freely allocated among products at one site. If you plan to model end of life credits, be ready to show conservative, traceable assumptions that match the PCR and EN 15804 A2 language.
A short playbook so you do not lose weeks
- Confirm the exact PCR and GPI versions in your verifier’s template, then lock your declared unit, modules, and scenarios to those references.
- Line up metering, fuels, supplier declarations, and grid factors early, since the data quality statement is now a first class citizen in the EPD.
- If you use process certification, schedule the annual audit and update your procedures to version 2.0 so publication does not stall after a successful verification.
Dates and numbers to keep on a sticky note
PCR 2019:14 version 2.0.0 published April 7, 2025, editorial 2.0.1 on June 5, 2025, valid until April 7, 2030 (EPD International, 2025). Sunset of 1.3.4 on June 20, 2025, and a temporary publication window up to 10 working days during the rush period in mid 2025 (EPD International, 2025). EPD validity is five years with mandatory annual internal follow up during that period, and process certification can carry five year validity when audited annually (EPD International, 2025).
Bottom line for manufacturing leaders
Treat PCR 2.0 like a software upgrade. It tidies the interface, tightens data expectations, and nudges us toward digital delivery. If your internal data pull is organized and your verifier sees complete evidence on the first pass, you win time that converts to spec wins. Dont wait for a renewal reminder to retool your approach.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does PCR 2019:14 version 1.3.4 stop being accepted for new EPDs under the International EPD System?
June 20, 2025 is the sunset date for v1.3.4. After that, new EPDs must use version 2.0.0 or later. Publication of EPDs verified before that date was supported within a temporarily extended review window of up to 10 working days (EPD International, 2025).
How long is an EPD valid under the International EPD System, and what happens during that period?
Five years. During that time, the EPD owner must perform an annual internal follow up and update the EPD if material changes occur, for example if an indicator worsens significantly. Process certifications may be issued with five year validity if annual audits are maintained (EPD International, 2025).
Do digital EPDs matter yet for contractors and specifiers?
Yes. The operator reported 62 fully digital EPDs published as of May 20, 2025, which signals a real shift toward machine readable product data that feeds specification and carbon accounting tools more directly (EPD International, 2025).
About the Author
Eric works at the intersection of sustainability, regulation, and business strategy, helping manufacturers navigate the evolving landscape of EPDs and LCAs. Having spoken with hundreds of teams across North America, brings a deep understanding of what drives ROI, what regulators are asking for, and how companies can stay ahead with smart, scalable approaches to environmental reporting.
