Data‑Center Ready: The Business Case for EPDs

5 min read
Published: January 19, 2026

Permitting boards and procurement teams are raising the bar on materials for hyperscale builds. Water and power anxieties have turned EPDs from a nice‑to‑have into a gate you must clear. If a bid lands without current, product‑specific declarations and credible LCAs, the conversation often ends before it starts.

Generate an illustration for an article following this concept:

Data‑Center Ready: The Business Case for EPDs
Permitting boards and procurement teams are raising the bar on materials for hyperscale builds. Water and power anxieties have turned EPDs from a nice‑to‑have into a gate you must clear. If a bid lands without current, product‑specific declarations and credible LCAs, the conversation often ends before it starts.

Ensure that you use no text, as this illustration will be used on international translations of the article..

Use an illustrative style (e.g. isometic) and don't generate in a photorealistic style.

Why “data‑center ready” matters now

U.S. electricity demand is set to hit new records through 2027, with agencies pointing to data centers as a key driver (EIA, 2026) (EIA, 2026). DOE expects domestic data center load to double or even triple by 2028, which magnifies scrutiny on upstream materials and their carbon (DOE, 2024) (DOE, 2024). In 2024, U.S. data centers used an estimated 183 TWh, more than 4% of national electricity, which concentrates local tension around power and siting (Pew Research, 2025).

Community pushback is a procurement risk

Local resistance is no longer anecdotal. At least 16 U.S. data‑center projects worth about 64 billion dollars were blocked or delayed due to community concerns over costs and resources (The Guardian, 2025). Southern Nevada data centers used about 716 million gallons of water in 2024, a visible number in a Colorado River‑dependent region (Las Vegas Review‑Journal, 2025).

Nuance matters. In West Des Moines, the utility reported data centers at roughly 2–7% of daily city water use during the period reviewed, while still imposing lawn watering bans for unrelated reasons (KCCI, 2025). Counties have even paused approvals to reassess risks, including a 182‑day moratorium in Idaho’s Kootenai County to study aquifer protection and grid impact (Coeur d’Alene Press, 2025).

Procurement gates have moved from “prefer” to “prove”

State Buy Clean rules are tightening. Colorado requires product‑specific Type III EPDs and sets maximum GWP limits for eligible materials on state projects, with updates beginning in 2026 and every four years after (OSA Buy Clean Colorado, 2025) (OSA, 2025). New York requires EPDs for all concrete mixes on state projects starting January 1, 2025 (NYS OGS, 2025). Washington’s Buy Clean and Buy Fair law adds reporting and standards for concrete, wood, and steel in large state buildings, which pushes suppliers toward verifiable declarations (WA Dept. of Commerce, 2024).

Federal signals shifted in early 2025, so manufacturers should not bank strategy on national incentives that may change. Teams still encounter EPD and GWP gates in RFPs for public and private data‑center work, especially where utilities and permitting boards are under pressure.

Amazon Gift Card

Win A $50 Amazon Gift Card in One Click!

Enter weekly raffle in one click • Help us get to know our readers and improve!

What “data‑center ready” EPDs look like

Think of a backstage pass that gets you through every checkpoint. The declaration itself is only the lanyard. The content, currency, and proof are the pass.

  • Product‑specific, third‑party verified EPDs aligned to the right PCR, with facility‑level data where feasible and clear A1–A3 coverage, plus A4 transport data when buyers ask for it.
  • GWP values mapped to common state thresholds and buyer targets, with mix or alloy variants ready for substitution decisions.
  • Renewal and PCR‑change monitoring so nothing lapses close to a bid window, and a plan to refresh if rules shift.
  • Pre‑formatted RFP packets that bundle EPD PDFs, plant locations, and brief emissions narratives suitable for public meetings and council packets.

Water and energy narratives belong in your EPD workflow

Communities worry about cooling water and local grid stress. An LCA partner can add short, plain‑English memos that connect your product’s GWP and energy inputs to known mitigation steps, like recycled content or lower‑clinker cement. Pair those memos with your EPD in submittals and in neighborhood Q&A sessions. It reads as competence, not spin.

Timelines without panic

RFPs and permit hearings often arrive with short notice. Keeping a rolling pipeline of current EPDs for your top SKUs avoids last‑minute scrambles when a data‑center spec calls the play. EPDs typically sit on five‑year validity, so plan a refresh cadence tied to PCR updates and major process changes. The cost is usually outweighed by even one mid‑sized win, which sales teams can miss without visible EPDs.

Picking the right EPD partner for this arena

Speed matters because permitting calendars do not wait. Look for white‑glove data collection, disciplined project management, and program‑operator agnosticism so you can publish where the buyer expects. Automated reminders, template RFP bundles, and transparent version control are not nice‑to‑haves, they are survival tools. We call this being data‑center ready.

Quick readiness check

  • Do our priority products have current product‑specific Type III EPDs mapped to relevant GWP thresholds in our target states?
  • Are EPD PDFs and one‑page narratives pre‑bundled for RFPs and community briefings?
  • Do we track PCR expiries and renewal windows with alerts 9–12 months ahead?
  • Can we quickly supply facility‑level energy and transport data if requested?

The takeaway for manufacturers

Data‑center work concentrates political heat, water questions, and power math in one place. EPDs turn opinion fights into evidence. If your declarations are current, threshold‑aligned, and ready to deploy, you clear gates faster and spend fewer cycles defending basics. If they are not, bids stall, and the spec drifts to whoever arrived prepared. Time to get definitley data‑center ready.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much electricity do data centers use in the United States and why does it matter for EPDs?

IEA estimates put U.S. data center use at 183 TWh in 2024, over 4% of national electricity, with DOE expecting loads to double or triple by 2028 (Pew Research, 2025; DOE, 2024). High local demand raises scrutiny on materials’ embodied carbon, so product‑specific EPDs that meet GWP thresholds are showing up as procurement gates.

Which state rules most clearly require EPDs or set GWP limits today?

Colorado’s Office of the State Architect requires product‑specific Type III EPDs and maximum GWP limits for materials on state projects, with reviews beginning in 2026 (OSA Buy Clean Colorado, 2025). New York’s OGS requires EPDs for all concrete mixes on state projects starting January 1, 2025 (NYS OGS, 2025). Washington’s Buy Clean and Buy Fair law adds reporting and standards for concrete, wood, and steel (WA Dept. of Commerce, 2024).

Is community pushback real enough to alter projects?

Yes. Reporting points to at least 16 projects worth roughly 64 billion dollars blocked or delayed over community concerns, and regions like Southern Nevada documented about 716 million gallons of data‑center water use in 2024 (The Guardian, 2025; Las Vegas Review‑Journal, 2025). EPD‑backed materials help teams answer embodied‑carbon questions with specifics.