ConstructionLCA Ltd: LCA and EPD services explained
Choosing an LCA partner is part science, part project management. If your team needs an Environmental Product Declaration and wants to understand what a specialist boutique like ConstructionLCA Ltd offers, here is the fast, factual read so you can scope work, plan timelines, and avoid rework later.
Who they are and where they focus
ConstructionLCA Ltd is the consultancy of Dr Jane Anderson, a long‑standing standards contributor in EN 15804 and ISO 21930. Their focus is construction products and building LCAs, with most work anchored in the UK and Europe. See background on their credentials and committee roles on the About page.
Services they appear to offer
ConstructionLCA’s public pages describe a set of specialist services rather than broad implementation teams:
- EPD verification across multiple programmes, plus strategic advice on programme selection and portfolio planning. Details under Verification Services and the earlier Consultancy Services.
- Critical review of ISO 14044 LCA studies and of EPD tools before production, aimed at catching modelling or scope issues early.
- PCR support, including advising on Sub‑PCRs and chairing or reviewing PCR panels.
- EPD strategy and digitisation guidance, including making EPD data usable in building LCA tools and procurement systems.
Based on these pages, they operate as a senior expert partner. For full LCA modelling and data collection at plant level, manufacturers should confirm scope explicitly in the proposal, since the site emphasises verification, review and strategy.
What a typical engagement looks like with traditional consultants
Expect structured discovery workshops, detailed questionnaires for utilities and bill of materials, and spreadsheet templates for site‑level data. Internal effort often falls on operations, R&D and procurement to chase supplier data and align a reference year. Verification by a programme‑approved verifier comes after modelling and background report drafting, and can take several weeks depending on product complexity and corrections required (IBU, 2024).
Timelines and validity to keep in view
EPDs in major programmes typically carry a five‑year validity, with owners required to review annually to keep data current (EPD International, 2025). Construction PCRs usually have a validity window of three to five years, after which a revision or extension applies, so PCR choice affects timing and rework risk (EPD International, 2025). In mid‑2025 the main construction PCR transitioned, and publication timelines temporarily extended to up to 10 working days to handle volume, which is a good example of why buffers matter in your plan (EPD International, 2025).
Tools and software expectations
ConstructionLCA notes experience with EPD digitisation and aligning datasets with building LCA tools. For manufacturers, that usually means preparing supplier Environmental Product Declarations where available, primary data from ERP or utility meters, and audience‑ready documentation like maintenance assumptions for use‑stage modules. When commissioning, ask how data will move from spreadsheets to machine‑readable formats so your EPDs are usable in procurement and design tools.
Programme operators they work with
Public pages list verification experience with the International EPD System, IBU, EPD Norge, EPD Ireland, and EPD Australasia. That coverage matters if your products sell in both UK and EU markets, since programme rules vary on details such as portfolio EPD rules and XML data handoff. See the full list under Verification Services.
Industries and product types
Signals on the site and posts suggest a concentration in construction materials and components rather than consumer goods, aligned to EN 15804 practice. If your portfolio spans multiple plants or variants, confirm whether a single EPD with ranges, a family EPD, or a tool‑based approach is recommended for your case.
Market context manufacturers should factor in
The volume of construction product EPDs continues to rise, now likely exceeding 180,000 globally across EN 15804 and ISO 21930 systems, so buyers increasingly expect verified product‑specific data (ASBP, 2025). With LEED v5 moving further toward embodied carbon transparency, having current, third‑party verified EPDs reduces penalty assumptions in project carbon accounting and helps keep products in contention for specifications.
What to ask before commissioning any LCA or EPD partner
- Scope clarity. Will they do modelling, data collection and background report drafting, or only verification and critical review.
- PCR strategy. Which PCR is recommended now, when does it expire, and what transition risk does that create in your renewal window. PCR validity is typically 3 to 5 years, so alignment matters (EPD International, 2025).
- Data intake. How will plant data be captured and validated. Questionnaires, on‑site workshops, API pulls from ERP, or a mix.
- Portfolio approach. One product, a family, or a parametric tool. How will variant coverage and updates be handled.
- Publication cadence. Typical verification queue times, and what happens if verifier comments require rework. Publication timelines can stretch during PCR transitions, sometimes up to 10 working days (EPD International, 2025).
- Digital deliverables. Will you receive both PDF and machine‑readable outputs suitable for procurement databases.
- Post‑publish obligations. Who monitors the annual internal follow‑up and triggers updates during the five‑year validity (EPD International, 2025).
Competitor landscape at this size and region
ConstructionLCA operates in a segment with other UK‑based boutiques, pan‑European sustainability consultancies attached to assurance bodies, and sole practioner verifiers who focus on EN 15804 construction products. Buyers often shortlist across those three types, then weigh speed, data‑collection support and programme familiarity rather than headline day‑rates.
Bottom line for manufacturers
ConstructionLCA presents as a senior expert shop for verification, PCR guidance, and critical review, with advisory on programme strategy and digital outputs. Manufacturers should budget internal time for data gathering and workshops, align on the right PCR upfront, and plan buffers around verification queues. That keeps surprises out of scope, and your declaration publish‑ready when sales needs it most.
Frequently Asked Questions
What EPD and LCA services does ConstructionLCA Ltd publicly promote for manufacturers?
Their site highlights EPD verification across several programmes, critical review of ISO 14044 LCAs and EPD tools, PCR advisory and review, EPD strategy, and digitisation guidance. See their pages on Verification Services and Consultancy Services.
How long are EPDs typically valid and what does that imply for planning?
Major programmes set five‑year validity with mandatory annual internal follow‑up, so teams should plan for mid‑cycle updates as data changes (EPD International, 2025).
What is the usual validity range for construction PCRs and why does it matter?
Construction PCRs often have three to five years of validity, so aligning your EPD timeline with PCR transitions avoids redo work if rules change mid‑project (EPD International, 2025).
What client experience should manufacturers expect with traditional consultants?
Workshops to define scope, detailed questionnaires, spreadsheet data collection by plant, iterative modelling and verifier feedback, and a verification phase that can take several weeks on complex products (IBU, 2024).
Which programme operators are referenced on ConstructionLCA’s site for verification work?
International EPD System, IBU, EPD Norge, EPD Ireland, and EPD Australasia are mentioned on their Verification Services page.
About the Author
Eric works at the intersection of sustainability, regulation, and business strategy, helping manufacturers navigate the evolving landscape of EPDs and LCAs. Having spoken with hundreds of teams across North America, brings a deep understanding of what drives ROI, what regulators are asking for, and how companies can stay ahead with smart, scalable approaches to environmental reporting.
