What exactly is expiring in December 2026
EC3 shows one “Trend”‑labeled EPD expiring in December 2026. The document appears to belong to Trend Snedkeri A/S, a Danish casework manufacturer, not Trend Power Technology. In other words, it is not a battery product and not part of Trend Power Technology’s scope. That matters because category mix‑ups can trigger unnecessary panic in sales pipelines.
Are replacement EPDs already live for Trend Power’s batteries
For Trend Power Technology’s core battery pack offering, we found an active UL‑verified EPD for a lithium‑ion secondary battery pack used as a server backup unit. It remains valid beyond 2026, so no December gap is forming for their battery equipment. Trend Power’s corporate site is here for quick context and contacts: https://www.trendpower.com.cn/.
If a gap had formed, what would specifiers reach for instead
Specifiers working on data‑center or industrial backup typically turn to battery cabinets or packs that publish current declarations under recognized operators. Two examples are widely cited and easy to reference.
- Schneider Electric’s Galaxy Lithium‑ion Battery Cabinet has a PEP Ecopassport with the latest version issued in June 2024, including detailed composition and 10‑year functional unit parameters (PEP Ecopassport, 2024) (PEP Ecopassport, 2024).
- Socomec’s Master Cabinet publishes a PEP Ecopassport that was updated in February 2025 and covers control and auxiliary power for storage systems, with full life‑cycle indicators reported (PEP Ecopassport, 2025) (PEP Ecopassport, 2025).
For a quick overview of Schneider’s EPD coverage across UPS and related hardware, see this roundup on EPD Guide, which many specifiers bookmark for fast checks: APC by Schneider: EPD coverage at a glance.
Join Parq Pulse!
Stay ahead of EPD expiry risks and ensure your projects remain competitive with our weekly insights.
What this means for spec eligibility in late 2026
Because the December 2026 entry appears unrelated to Trend Power Technology’s product line, specifiers should not lose access to Trend Power EPD data at year‑end. The practical risk is confusion. If project teams see a “Trend” expiration without context, they may assume the battery pack data is lapsing and default to cabinet‑level alternatives that show fresh declarations. That can nudge volume away even when it shouldn’t.
Why timely renewals still matter when the current EPD is safe
Even with no 2026 cliff, renewal lead‑times sneak up. Most program operators and verifiers have batching cycles and queue times. Leaving renewals until the last quarter can slow approvals and delay EC3 listings. That lag can cost placements on schedules that demand third‑party verified product‑specific data. Publishing early protects pipeline momentum and keeps distributor teams from second‑guessing specs.
Tidy‑up actions we recommend for manufacturers
- Confirm the correct publisher name, legal entity, and product family are attached to each declaration in public registries. A clean listing avoids teh “wrong Trend” issue.
- Pre‑book renewal slots so reference data is collected and verified well before the final month. That keeps sales teams selling instead of explaining paperwork.
- Align the EPD scope with how customers buy. If a cabinet is the unit procured, publish at cabinet level. If packs are sold as BBUs, keep the pack‑level EPD current.
Bottom line for specifiers and sales teams
There is no evidence of a December 2026 EPD gap for Trend Power Technology’s battery equipment. Keep using their active declaration for backup battery packs and monitor renewal timing so procurement does not drift to battery cabinets from brands with freshly posted documents like Schneider or Socomec (PEP Ecopassport, 2024) (PEP Ecopassport, 2025). If you need a quick scan of comparable EPDs in the category, start with program‑operator registries and the EPD Guide snapshot linked above.
