Edge Impact’s LCA and EPD Services, Explained

Who Edge Impact is and where they operate

Edge Impact is a sustainability consultancy headquartered in Australia with teams across Australia, New Zealand and Latin America. Their contact page lists offices in Sydney, Melbourne and Adelaide, plus regional presence in NZ and LATAM (Edge Impact contact). They position themselves as an advisory firm combining science, strategy and delivery.

Services manufacturers will notice

Edge promotes LCA and EPD work in its services catalogue including Environmental Product Declarations, product and service footprinting, claim substantiation and verification, and support for LCA tooling and digital integration (Edge Impact services). The Circular Economy and Lifecycle Thinking page highlights EPDs, lifecycle verification, and design‑stage LCA for product development (service detail).

LCA studies and EPD creation

Manufacturers can expect support to scope system boundaries, collect plant and supplier data, model cradle‑to‑gate or cradle‑to‑grave impacts, and generate an LCA report suitable for EPD publication. Edge publishes a life cycle assessment explainer and whitepaper that signals method guidance for teams starting their first study (LCA explainer). EPD validity is normally five years in leading programs, with updates required if impacts worsen beyond the operator’s threshold (EPD International FAQ, 2025) (EPD International, 2025).

PCR selection and verification support

Edge’s service pages reference EPD verification and claim substantiation, which typically means aligning to EN 15804, selecting the right Product Category Rule, and coordinating third‑party review with a verifier or certification body (Edge Impact services). If you are scheduling work in 2025, note that the widely used construction PCR version 2019:14 v1.3.4 reached its sunset on 20 June 2025, with v2.0.x active for new work (EPD International, 2025) (EPD International, 2025).

Data collection and tools

Based on public materials, Edge supports standard LCA software workflows and can integrate digital data where available. Practically, teams should expect structured data templates, bill‑of‑materials and recipe pulls, utility and waste data for a defined reference year, and periodic QA touchpoints. Many consultants still rely on spreadsheets and workshops to capture site specifics. Modern buyers increasingly expect low‑friction data intake and faster turnarounds, so press for clarity on how your operational data will move from the shop floor to a verified declaration without bogging down your team.

Typical industries and product focus

Edge’s site points to depth in construction and building products, plus manufacturing, retail and agriculture, with lifecycle work woven into circular design and procurement programs (service detail). For building products, EPDs remain a common route to market credibility as projects benchmark embodied carbon and materials transparency. The buildings sector still consumes roughly 32 percent of global energy and contributes about 34 percent of CO₂ emissions, which keeps product‑specific data in demand (UNEP and GlobalABC, 2025) (UNEP, 2025).

Geographic focus and program operators

Given their ANZ and LATAM footprint, manufacturers in Australia and New Zealand will likely intersect with EPD Australasia and the International EPD System. Recent operator guidance also reconfirmed five‑year validity for EPD process certificates, subject to annual audits, which can matter for high‑volume portfolios (EPD International, 2025) (EPD International, 2025). Ask which operator template and PCR version will be used for your category before data collection begins.

What working with a traditional consultancy feels like

Expect a structured but hands‑on process. Kickoffs often include scoping workshops. Data collection typically runs through questionnaires and spreadsheet templates tied to a selected reference year. There are back‑and‑forths for clarifications, model reviews, and verifier Q&A. Timelines can be longer when supplier data is thin or when multi‑site sampling is needed. Internal effort is non‑trivial without proactive data wrangling support, so align early on who chases utilities, who consolidates ERP pulls, and who validates mass balances. Dont underestimate the calendar time for verifier rounds.

Alternatives you may compare against

In the same ANZ market segment, manufacturers often compare Edge with thinkstep‑anz, Lifecycles, and start2see for product LCA and EPD work. Global firms with ANZ presence like WSP or ERM sometimes appear in RFPs for broader ESG scopes that include product LCAs. Selection usually comes down to category experience, data‑collection approach, verifier relationships and the promised timeline to publication.

Buying checklist to assess fit

Ask for a draft data schema before kickoff and a named list of PCRs that could apply to your products. Confirm the target program operator and verifier pool. Request a week‑by‑week plan from data request to published EPD and a contingency for additional verifier questions. Verify how supplier‑specific materials, allocation rules, and A4 transport will be handled, since those can swing results and review time. If speed to publication matters, ask explicitly how the team will reduce your internal lift.

Bottom line for manufacturers

Edge Impact appears to offer the full consultant playbook for LCAs and EPDs, from scoping through verification and publication, with regional depth in Australia, New Zealand and Latin America. Given active PCR timelines and five‑year EPD validity norms, the right partner keeps your declarations both compliant and current without draining plant teams (EPD International, 2025) (EPD International, 2025). In a market where buildings account for roughly a third of energy‑related emissions, credible product data is not a nice‑to‑have. It is a sales enabler that keeps specifications in play (UNEP and GlobalABC, 2025) (UNEP, 2025).