Does Appendix BL treat hempcrete as structural or infill material?

It allows only non-load-bearing infill around a separate structural frame, with minimum compressive strength of 0.5 MPa (ICC, 2024).

Will Minnesota require third-party testing for strawbale moisture content?

Yes. Appendix BJ sets a maximum 20 % moisture by weight at time of enclosure and asks for an accredited lab certificate.

Can I reuse a European hempcrete EPD for the U.S. market?

No. EN 15804 EPDs omit U.S. transportation and energy mixes. You will need a North American LCA dataset or a new EPD.

How long does EPD development typically take for plant-based walls?

With an experienced partner the process averages six to eight months from data kick-off to publication, though complex supply chains may add extra weeks.

Will code officials accept dynamic LCA results that show future carbon uptake?

Not yet. Most PCRs still require 100-year Global Warming Potential using static characterization factors.

Minnesota Eyes Hempcrete and Strawbale in 2024 IRC

What the new appendices actually say

Appendix BL sets prescriptive rules for wall thickness, fire resistance, moisture control and structural loads of hemp-lime infill. Appendix BJ does the same for load-bearing or in-fill strawbales. In short, the documents turn folk-lore building tricks into code-compliant recipes vetted by ICC committees (ICC, 2024).

Why Minnesota’s vote matters beyond state lines

Minnesota is often an early adopter of progressive energy and envelope provisions. When it folds an IRC appendix into Chapter 1309, regional jurisdictions from the Dakotas to Wisconsin tend to copy‐paste within two to three years (Midwest Building Officials Survey, 2024). A green light here hints at a broader Upper-Midwest market worth hundreds of millions in annual residential starts.

Timeline checkpoints

Department of Labor & Industry public comment window: Oct 15 – Nov 30 2025.
Construction Codes Advisory Council recommendation: Jan 22 2026.
Earliest effective date if approved: Aug 1 2026 (DLI Rulemaking Docket, 2024). Missing any filing deadline could push adoption back a full code cycle so mark your calender.

Code recognition unlocks specifications

Designers can cite an appendix instead of writing an equivalency memo. That chops weeks off plan-review. Faster approvals make hempcrete and strawbale viable for production builders chasing aggressive construction schedules.

EPD signal: prove carbon claims early

Both materials tout carbon negativity. Yet buyers still ask for proof. An ISO 14025 EPD built from a robust cradle-to-grave LCA will hold more water with code officials and lenders than marketing one-pagers. Recent LCA work shows hempcrete can hit −80 kg CO₂e per m² of wall at 35 % hemp by weight (Shanbhag et al., 2024). Strawbale walls register roughly 50 % lower embodied carbon than fired-brick equivalents (Cornaro et al., 2024). Those figures sing only when wrapped in a third-party verified EPD.

Data hurdles unique to plant-based walls

• Biogenic carbon: Program operators now require separate reporting of sequestered biomass. • Regional agriculture footprints: Fertilizer use swings results by up to 30 % for straw (Mattila et al., 2023). Collect farm-gate data, not generic EU numbers.
• Lime carbonation credit: Some PCRs cap the credit at 75 % of theoretical uptake (NIST SP 1324, 2024).

Action checklist for manufacturers

Track the rule docket weekly and submit a support letter.
Start an LCA scoping exercise by January; lab testing for fire and R-value can run parallel.
Pick a program operator familiar with bio-based materials so review queries stay reasonable.

Keep watch

If Minnesota finalizes adoption by summer 2026, permit offices will begin referencing the appendices in plan checks almost immediatly. Companies ready with tested assemblies and clean EPDs will grab the first mover edge while competitors scramble to catch up.