Nudura ICFs: product lineup and EPD coverage
Insulated concrete forms sit at the crossroads of structure and envelope, which is exactly where specifiers scrutinize documentation. Nudura’s core ICF products have published EPDs in play and country‑specific FDES in France, yet some variants still look light on coverage. If an owner or LEED v5–driven team asks for product‑specific declarations by series, that gap can slow a submittal and open the door to substitutes. Here is the quick snapshot manufacturers want when planning their own roadmap.


Who Nudura is
Nudura manufactures insulated concrete forms within Tremco CPG, part of RPM International. The business was acquired in 2018 and continues to operate as a dedicated ICF brand (BusinessWire, 2018).
What they sell, at a glance
Nudura focuses on one primary category, insulated concrete forms, with several series and accessories. The range includes the ICF Series, One Series, Plus Series forms and inserts, and the higher‑insulation XR35, along with bracing, hangers, and waterproofing compatible with the wall system (ICF Series, One Series, Plus Series, XR35). Across sizes, corners, and inserts, the total SKU count lands in the dozens rather than hundreds.
EPD coverage today
Nudura has a product‑level EPD published through the International EPD System that covers its core ICF offering. In France, FDES entries exist for “Bloc Coffrant Isolant Nudura Standard” and for XR35, visible to RE2020 workflows via INIES. EPDs and FDES are typically valid for five years, which aligns with current operator rules (EPD International FAQ, 2025, INIES, 2025).
Where coverage is strong
A single product‑specific EPD that represents the mainstream ICF blocks lets teams answer most general requests quickly. The two French FDES mean local practitioners can pull Nudura’s declared data directly inside modeling tools without resorting to generic proxies, which keeps bids moving.
Likely gaps to close
We do not see seperate, series‑specific EPDs for One Series or Plus Series inserts, and accessories like hangers or bracing are typically outside the scope. That may be fine in many submittals, yet some owners and design teams now ask for declarations that match the exact assembly being installed. If the ask narrows to a specific series or configuration, having a dedicated EPD shortens back‑and‑forth in review.
Competitive context on projects
Direct ICF competitors commonly encountered include Logix or its Element ICF successor, Fox Blocks, BuildBlock, Amvic, Superform, and IntegraSpec. On certain envelopes, project teams may also consider non‑ICF alternatives with strong documentation such as insulated precast wall panels, which publish fresh industry‑average EPDs by PCI in 2025 (PCI, 2025). This does not make ICFs apples‑to‑apples comparable, it simply shows substitutes can present clean paperwork fast.
Why this matters commercially
On projects that reward or require product‑specific EPDs under owner policies or LEED v5 language, showing a current declaration removes friction at prequal and submittal. Without one, reviewers default to conservative proxies, which can push the assembly out of contention on carbon‑tracked jobs. That often forces price‑only competition, not performance.
A short playbook to strengthen Nudura’s specability
- Package variants under one EPD when rules allow, or spin out series‑specific EPDs where performance or bill‑of‑materials diverge meaningfully. The goal is fewer RFI loops.
- Match the operator your target market recognizes, and confirm the current PCR before scoping work. Most EN 15804 construction EPDs sit on a five‑year clock, so plan renewals backward from key bid windows (EPD International FAQ, 2025).
- Streamline data collection early. The heavy lift is inside plants and purchasing, not in the final PDF. Teams that centralize utility, resin, cement and transport records get out the door much faster.
Sustainability signals on their site
Nudura’s European site hosts a sustainability explainer and confirms EPD availability in its Technical Zone, a useful pointer for spec writers. See “Build sustainably for the future” to understand how they position ICFs in operational‑carbon terms (Nudura sustainability).
Bottom line for manufacturers watching this space
Nudura looks like a focused pure‑play in ICFs with a current product EPD and localized French FDES coverage. The clear upside is to extend declarations to distinct series so every frequently specified configuration carries its own passport. Do that, and spec teams stop hesitating, which is the make‑or‑break moment in many envelope packages. If documenation lags, equally credible wall systems that already publish EPDs can step in and take the work (PCI, 2025, INIES, 2025).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Nudura a single‑category brand or a broad materials company?
A single‑category brand. Nudura focuses on insulated concrete forms, offered in several series plus accessories, rather than spanning multiple unrelated product families.
Roughly how big is Nudura’s SKU footprint?
Dozens. Different core widths, corners, radii, inserts, and panels create many item numbers, but the portfolio is not in the hundreds.
Does Nudura have product‑specific EPDs today?
Yes. There is a product EPD for the core ICFs in the International EPD System and French FDES entries for the Standard and XR35 series. EPDs and FDES typically carry five‑year validity windows (EPD International FAQ, 2025, INIES, 2025).
Where could EPD coverage improve for Nudura?
Series‑specific EPDs for One Series and Plus Series would remove ambiguity in submittals that call for exact‑match declarations, especially on projects with tight sustainability requirements.
Who are the main competitors Nudura meets in bids?
Commonly seen ICF brands include Element ICF and Logix ICF, Fox Blocks, BuildBlock, Amvic, Superform, and IntegraSpec. In some envelopes, insulated precast or insulated metal panels show up as alternates, often with ready EPDs (PCI, 2025).
