Where MBCC sits today
MBCC became part of Sika in May 2023 after global antitrust review. Selected admixture assets in the US, Canada, Europe, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand were sold to Cinven as a remedy, with the balance integrated into Sika’s portfolio (Sika, 2023, Sika, 2023). The acquired MBCC businesses generated CHF 2.1 billion in 2022 and employ about 6,200 people across 95 sites (Sika, 2023).
Translation for specifiers. MBCC’s legacy brands and SKUs are now found under either Sika labels or the independent Master Builders Solutions company, depending on region and product family.
What they sell, in plain words
Across brands, the portfolio spans concrete admixtures and cement additives, macro and micro synthetic fibers, grouts for civil and offshore wind, underground construction and tunneling chemicals, waterproofing membranes and coatings, repair mortars, protective coatings, sealants, and expansion joints. Count the product categories in the low double digits, with total SKUs easily in the hundreds globally. That breadth means they rarely show up to a project with just one lever to pull.
Curious about how top manufacturers navigate EPDs?
Follow us on LinkedIn for insights that help you understand market dynamics and enhance your project specifications.
EPD coverage at a glance
Product‑specific EPDs are present in meaningful numbers across several lines. You’ll find declarations for select admixtures and cement additives, macro and micro fibers used in concrete, high‑performance grouts, and infrastructure waterproofing systems. These EPDs appear under well‑known program operators, including EPD International, ASTM, UL, and newer operators focused on digital workflows. Many of the most recent documents reflect EN 15804+A2 conventions and modern verification patterns, which keeps them friendly for EU use while still readable for North American teams.
Practical takeaway. If a project team is tallying embodied carbon for LEED v5 or owner policy, MBCC‑line products can usually be represented with a product‑specific, third‑party verified document rather than a generic database value that carries a penalty. That keeps them in the conversation on carbon‑constrained bids.
Where gaps are likely
Two friction points still pop up in submittals. First, expansion joint systems and some site‑applied chemistries show patchier EPD availability relative to their concrete‑contact portfolio. Second, the post‑acquisition split means declarations for near‑identical chemistries can live under different brand owners or operators by region, which confuses binder tabs. A clean, region‑specific EPD map that lists successor brands avoids “is this the same product” questions and prevents last‑minute substitutions.
If a frequently specified SKU in a given geography has no product‑specific EPD, specifiers often default to a conservative value that makes the product look higher‑carbon than it is. That can quietly push it off shortlists on projects chasing explicit carbon ceilings.
Who they meet in the spec ring
They most often square up against Sika, Mapei, Saint‑Gobain’s construction chemicals businesses, Tremco CPG, Fosroc, and Euclid Chemical. On the owner side, you’ll see them compared for offices and logistics boxes, heavy civil and DOT work, water infrastructure, transit, energy, healthcare, and education. In those arenas, having product‑specific EPDs for the exact chemistry being proposed speeds acceptance and reduces value‑engineering swaps.
Sustainability signals worth noting
Sika’s Strategy 2028 targets a 20% absolute reduction in scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2028 versus a 2022 baseline, which frames how MBCC‑origin products are being reformulated and documented inside the group (Sika Strategy 2028, 2025). Master Builders Solutions publishes its own sustainability materials and reporting, which can be a useful reference during submittal prep (Master Builders Solutions Sustainability, 2024).
What this means for winning specs
Two moves pay off fast. First, align each target SKU to the program operator favored in the project’s region so the reviewer can verify it in seconds. Second, keep a one‑page crosswalk that shows the lineage of any MBCC‑named product to its current brand owner and the right EPD link. It sounds simple, but it removes the most common reason a reviewer pauses and asks for an alternative. Do this and the enviromental paperwork stops slowing the sale.
