Lehigh Cement, Now Heidelberg Materials: EPDs At A Glance
Specifiers want the short answer: does Lehigh Cement, now operating in North America under the Heidelberg Materials brand, have the product range and EPD coverage to win todays specs without extra carbon paperwork drama? Here’s the crisp, commercial readout.


Who they are, where they play
Lehigh Cement is the cement arm inside Heidelberg Materials North America. The group runs 10 cement plants, more than 5 slag grinding plants, 4 coal‑ash beneficiation plants, and over 70 cementitious terminals across North America (Heidelberg Materials US Cement Products, 2025) (link).
What they make
Portfolio breadth is wide for a “cement pure‑play”: portland and portland‑limestone cements, slag cement, fly ash, blended Type IS, masonry cements including colored options, white cement, specialty cements such as TX Active, plus oil‑well cement. That’s a dozen‑plus product families, with SKUs easily in the dozens per region and collectively in the hundreds when you map plant‑specific variants.
EPD coverage snapshot
Heidelberg Materials states that plant product‑specific EPDs have been published for the majority of its cement plants, using NRMCA as program operator, and it lists site‑by‑site links on its EPD page (Heidelberg Materials Concrete & Cement EPDs, 2025) (link). On the concrete side, the company operates over 150 concrete production plants across North America and provides ASTM‑program EPDs by region to match mix designs (Heidelberg Materials Concrete & Cement EPDs, 2025) (link).
Strengths for specability
For core binders used in ready‑mix and precast, coverage is strong: plant‑specific EPDs for many Type I/II and Type IL cements, plus robust concrete mix EPD libraries in key metros. In practical terms, this lets project teams document embodied‑carbon quickly instead of defaulting to conservative assumptions that can sink a bid’s carbon budget.
Where gaps may remain
Specialty lines look spottier. The public EPD page emphasizes plant‑specific cement and regional concrete EPDs, then points to industry‑wide EPDs for categories like masonry cement and blended cements. If a project team prefers product‑specific EPDs everywhere, colored masonry, white cement, and oil‑well cement may not be consistently covered across all plants yet. That is fixable with a focused, plant‑by‑plant LCA push.
A likely best‑seller to prioritize
Masonry cement. It’s a staple across education, multifamily, and civic work. When only an industry‑wide EPD is available, some owners and LEED v5‑aligned specs lean toward product‑specific disclosures for extra confidence. Closing that gap reduces substitution risk at the last minute.
Competitive set you’ll face
On cement, expect Holcim US, CalPortland, CEMEX USA, Titan America, GCC, Buzzi, Eagle Materials, Martin Marietta, and Argos to show up on the same projects. Several publish broad cement and concrete EPD libraries and have public EPD hubs you can reference during submittals, for example Holcim’s EPD page and regional mix libraries. The arms race isn’t just performance, it’s documentation.
Commercial takeaway for manufacturers
EPDs are not marketing gloss. They protect margin by keeping your products comparable on carbon without forcing price concessions. If coverage is uneven across plants or product families, prioritize high‑volume SKUs first, align on the dominant PCR your competitors use, and make data collection painless for plant teams. The fastest wins are usually plant‑specific cement EPDs where only an industry average exists, followed by high‑runner masonry cements.
Sustainability links worth bookmarking
Heidelberg Materials’ cement portfolio, locations, and standards overview live here, and the company’s EPD hub outlines which plants and regions already publish verified declarations. That makes it easier to spot gaps and plan the next round of declarations.
- Cement products overview with network size and product families (Heidelberg Materials US Cement Products, 2025) (link)
- Concrete and cement EPD library, including plant lists and regional mix EPDs (Heidelberg Materials Concrete & Cement EPDs, 2025) (link)
Thread it all together
Lehigh Cement’s rebranded platform has the range to cover most specs and the enviromental disclosures to back it up. The biggest upside is finishing coverage for masonry and specialty cements with product‑specific EPDs so submittals glide instead of stall. The teams that make EPD creation ruthlessly easy on plants will win on speed, completeness, and fewer after‑hours fire drills.
Frequently Asked Questions
What Heidelberg Materials products are most likely already covered by product-specific EPDs?
Core portland and portland‑limestone cements at many plants and numerous regional concrete mixes, per the company’s EPD hub. Masonry and some specialty cements more often rely on industry‑wide EPDs referenced on the same page.
Roughly how many product families and SKUs does Heidelberg Materials carry in cementitious materials?
About a dozen‑plus product families and SKUs in the dozens per region, collectively in the hundreds when considering plant‑specific variants. Exact counts vary by market and are not centrally published.
Which competitors most often go head-to-head with Heidelberg Materials on cement EPDs?
Holcim US, CEMEX USA, CalPortland, Titan America, Buzzi, GCC, Eagle Materials, Martin Marietta, and Argos are frequent comparables on public projects and private work where EPDs influence selection.
Where should manufacturers start if their EPD coverage is patchy?
Start with high‑volume binders at plants serving EPD‑sensitive markets, align on the common PCR competitors use, then extend to masonry and specialty cements. Keep data collection lightweight for plants to avoid bottlenecks.
