EPD Hub: a digital‑native program operator (One Click LCA's Program Operator)

What EPD Hub is and where it fits

EPD Hub is a program operator that verifies and publishes Type III EPDs aligned with EN 15804 and ISO 14025. It operates globally and is recognized as an Established ECO EPD Programme Operator as of December 2025, which signals alignment with ECO Platform’s audit framework for construction EPDs.

How the workflow actually runs

Submissions are designed to flow straight from pre‑verified EPD generator tools into EPD Hub for screening, verifier assignment, and publishing. The platform applies automated checks to catch format and data issues early, then routes files to approved verifiers with relevant product expertise. Manufacturers interact in one portal, which trims email chains and keeps a single source of truth during verification.

Ownership and independence, in plain terms

EPD Hub sits inside a broader business ecosystem that also operates an LCA and EPD‑generation software suite. That vertical integration powers speed and usability for submitters. It also concentrates power, so buyers should look closely at how verifiers are approved, assigned, and firewalled from commercial targets. EPD Hub states that verification decisions are insulated from revenue goals and that the board cannot influence technical approvals. The model can work, provided governance is documented and enforced consistently.

Rules and scope at a glance

EPD Hub runs on a single General Program Instructions document and a cross‑category PCR that cover construction, electrical, manufactured products, energy supply, and built‑environment services. The current set was updated on March 24, 2025 to align with ECO Platform guidance and to clarify verifier training and acceptance windows. One living rulebook can reduce interpretation drift across a portfolio, especially for multi‑site or multi‑line manufacturers.

Growth and scale signals

The public library claims over 4,000 published EPDs, which points to broad tooling support and a steady submission pipeline (EPD Hub, 2026). The operator also reports a 132% increase in published EPDs in 2024, an indicator that adoption accelerated last year (EPD Hub, 2026). Volume alone does not equal quality, yet it does matter commercially when project teams search large catalogs first.

Where the fit is strongest

Teams that prize speed, structured templates, and fewer back‑and‑forth cycles tend to benefit. Integrated submissions reduce file handling, and centralized verifier allocation can normalize expectations. For manufacturers coordinating many similar SKUs, the single‑PCR approach keeps formatting and impact reporting consistent, which simplifies sales enablement and downstream database ingestion.

What to scrutinize before you commit

Think of this like inspecting a factory line before a big run. Ask how verifiers are selected for your product category, how conflicts are screened, and how comments are recorded and traceable. Confirm whether non‑ecosystem tools can be accepted, under what pre‑verification terms, and who pays for any extra checks. Clarify publishing timelines and queue logic if you plan a batch pubishing.

Commercial lens for spec‑driven sales

For many projects, a product‑specific EPD removes penalty assumptions that otherwise push buyers toward competitors. The faster you can publish a credible declaration, the sooner you compete on performance and availability instead of price alone. Reliable timelines and predictable reviewer expectations are often worth more than a small fee difference when a bid window is closing fast.

A few practical questions to take to your next internal meeting

• Does our reference year data map cleanly to the platform’s templates, or will we need extra data wrangling to fit the schema?
• If we are updating an existing declaration, will verifier continuity be maintained to avoid re‑litigating prior decisions?
• Are there market‑specific publication preferences among our target customers that would favor an alternative operator for certain SKUs?
• What is the trigger for re‑verification if we change suppliers, energy mix, or transport modes mid‑cycle, and how will that appear in public records?

Bottom‑line take

EPD Hub offers a streamlined, software‑centric path from LCA model to verified declaration, paired with governance claims aimed at addressing independence concerns. Manufacturers should weigh the efficiency upside against the need for clear guardrails on verifier autonomy and tool acceptance. If those checks pass, the program’s digital cadence can help teams ship credible EPDs on time and win specs that were previously out of reach.