Sika resinous flooring: EPD coverage at a glance

Who Sika is, and where resin floors fit

Sika sells across the envelope and the slab: roofing, sealants, admixtures, waterproofing, and more. Resinous flooring is a major segment within that broader portfolio, marketed under Sikafloor, Sika ComfortFloor, Pulastic, and Ucrete. That range spans epoxy, polyurethane, polyaspartic, electrostatic-dissipative, and urethane-cement systems.

What Sika actually markets in resin flooring

Browse the US site and you will find dozens of product and system pages across decorative, ESD, comfort, and heavy‑duty industrial families, from Sikafloor-218 DF and -264 to ComfortFloor PS systems and Merflex waterproofing variants (Sika product pages, 2026). This matters because specs often name the system, not the individual part A or B resin.

EPD coverage in the United States

Sika holds a single multi‑product resin flooring EPD with NSF that explicitly lists 16 named systems. It covers ComfortFloor PS 23 and PS 65, Sikafloor DecoDur Flake, Granite, Metallic, and Quartz, ESD, Merflex ES and PS, MultiDur EC and HS, plus Ucrete SL, SL+, TG, and VG. The listing is valid from December 28, 2023 through December 28, 2028 (NSF, 2023–2028) (NSF, 2025). For US projects targeting LEED v5 credits on product disclosures, that breadth keeps these systems spec‑ready without extra paperwork.

Global and regional adds to the picture

Beyond the NSF record, Sika has several Ucrete system EPDs registered with EPD International, valid to late 2030, which helps multinational spec pipelines where EN 15804 is preferred (EPD International, 2025) (EPD International, 2025). Sika subsidiaries have also published reaction‑resin EPDs with ASTM, including Sikafloor 161 and Sikafloor 92 EG, noted on the ASTM registry (ASTM, 2024) (ASTM, 2024).

Notable gaps to watch

Two things jump out. First, Sika markets ComfortFloor PS‑25 and other variants, yet PS‑25 is not named in the NSF product table, which could introduce RFI churn on projects that only accept explicitly listed systems unless the EPD narrative clarifies coverage (NSF, 2025). Second, popular epoxy components like Sikafloor‑264 appear as part of systems on the website, but they are not singled out by name on the NSF listing. If a spec calls that exact model, the team may need to map it to a listed system or commission a targeted addendum.

Why gaps matter commercially

Many owners and AEC firms assign a documentation penalty to products without product‑specific, third‑party EPDs. That pushes decision‑makers toward floor systems that keep carbon accounting clean and predictable for LEED v5 materials credits. When a marketed system is missing on an operator’s product table, submittals slow down and substitution risk climbs. One missing EPD can be the loose thread that unravels a bid. It is a silly risk to take.

The competitive set on jobsites

Sika often meets Sherwin‑Williams High Performance Flooring, Stonhard, Tremco CPG’s Flowcrete, and Key Resin.

• Sherwin‑Williams has multiple resinous flooring EPDs with NSF, including FasTop urethane‑cement and new Armorseal and Resuflor entries with current validity windows (NSF, 2022–2025) (NSF, 2025).
• Key Resin lists EPDs for terrazzo and urethane‑cement systems, which directly compete in food, beverage, and pharma spaces (NSF, 2024–2025) (NSF, 2025). These competitors are well represented in verticals where resin floors are mission‑critical.

If Sika were prioritizing next EPD moves

Target the explicitly marketed systems not named on the NSF listing, starting with ComfortFloor PS‑25. Align the PCR choice with what competitors use for like‑for‑like comparability, then assemble plant‑specific utility and throughput data for the reference year so verification stays smooth. For systems sold globally, consider parallel publication with EPD International to cover EN 15804 buyers while keeping the NSF record fresh.

What spec‑driven teams should do now

Audit the opportunity pipeline against the NSF product table. Where a named system is missing, decide whether to steer the spec toward a listed near‑equivalent or to create a short‑cycle addendum. The cost of a focused EPD update is often recouped by a single mid‑size healthcare or education project win. Collecting the right operational data early is the difference between a two‑month sprint and a season of emails, spreadsheets and delays.

Bottom line

Sika’s resinous flooring coverage is broadly strong in the US thanks to a single multi‑system EPD that captures many of its most specified lines, plus fresh Ucrete EPDs in Europe. The remaining work is tactical. Name the missing systems in an operator table, keep renewal dates on radar, and make it trivially easy for specifiers to say yes. Miss that, and a competitor with a clickable EPD page will get speficied first.