Managing EPD Data When ERP Shifts

5 min read
Published: January 19, 2026

ERP migrations split data across old and new systems right when environmental teams need clean inputs for LCAs and EPDs. The trick is not to wait for perfect systems. Use a disciplined, reference‑year approach, document gaps, and give IT and plant teams clear asks that respect the rollout. The EPD can move even while the ERP moves, if the work is framed correctly.

Generate an illustration for an article following this concept:

Managing EPD Data When ERP Shifts
ERP migrations split data across old and new systems right when environmental teams need clean inputs for LCAs and EPDs. The trick is not to wait for perfect systems. Use a disciplined, reference‑year approach, document gaps, and give IT and plant teams clear asks that respect the rollout. The EPD can move even while the ERP moves, if the work is framed correctly.

Ensure that you use no text, as this illustration will be used on international translations of the article..

Use an illustrative style (e.g. isometic) and don't generate in a photorealistic style.

Start with a fixed reference year

Pick the reporting year early and stick to it. EPD modeling compares like with like, so a locked year prevents endless rework when transactional data keeps hopping between legacy and new modules. Freeze the product scope as well, so new SKUs entering the ERP do not derail the plan mid‑stream.

Define a minimum viable dataset

Agree on the smallest set of inputs that lets an LCA proceed, then collect everything else in parallel. A simple rule helps teams focus on what actually feeds the model instead of rummaging for every last byte.

  • Plant energy by carrier (electricity, natural gas, fuels) with meter reads or invoices
  • Annual production volumes and allocation keys per plant
  • Bills of materials or recipe tables with material IDs and weights
  • Inbound transport modes and typical distances per material
  • Waste streams and treatment routes at the plant

Map fields once, translate often

Create a single crosswalk that shows how each required field is named in legacy ERP, in the new ERP, and in shop‑floor logs. Keep the crosswalk in a shared folder, versioned. When names or IDs change, the crosswalk changes, not the LCA model structure.

Amazon Gift Card

Win A $50 Amazon Gift Card in One Click!

Enter weekly raffle in one click • Help us get to know our readers and improve!

Pull energy and volumes outside the ERP when needed

For many plants, meters, utility portals, and production logs are faster to access than ERP reports. That is worth it. The industrial sector accounts for about 23 percent of total US greenhouse gas emissions for 2022, so plant energy quality directly shapes EPD results (US EPA, 2024) (US EPA, 2024).

Keep a living gap register and proxy rules

List every missing field with its owner, due date, and an approved temporary proxy. Tie proxies to the governing PCR and note when they will be replaced. EPDs are typically valid for five years, so a defensible proxy today can be updated at renewal without losing commercial momentum (EPD International, 2024) (EPD International, 2024).

Clarify roles so people are not double‑booked

Sustainability defines data needs and checks conformance. IT extracts data and maintains the field crosswalk. Plant teams validate numbers and timing. Set response time targets and a weekly 30‑minute standup so issues surface early. It sounds small, but cadence beats heroics.

Create a single source of truth

Stand up a read‑only data room with folders for source files, transformed files, and sign‑off records. Use simple naming like Plant_YYYY_Source.xlsx. Add a change log that records who changed what and when. Auditors love it, and so will next year’s renewal team.

Protect comparability while SKUs evolve

ERP migrations often reshape BOMs and SKU hierarchies. Lock the modeling assumptions for the reference year and keep a separate appendix that explains how a legacy SKU maps to a new one. If a product truly changes, treat it as a new variant rather than silently blending data.

Choose proxies that age well

When gaps persist, prefer proxies sourced from high‑quality LCI libraries and program‑operator guidance. Document why the proxy fits the product and region, and set a date to revisit once the ERP data stabilizes. Prospective EPDs can be appropriate for brand‑new lines if production history is short, provided the PCR allows it.

Vendor questions that de‑risk ERP turbulence

  • What is your minimum viable dataset for an LCA by product family, and will you publish that list up front?
  • How do you handle field crosswalks when ERP names and IDs change mid‑project?
  • Can your workflow accept meter data and shop‑floor logs without waiting for ERP reports?
  • How are proxies governed so the final EPD is verifiable and comparable under EN 15804 or ISO 14025?
  • What does your audit trail look like across versions, reviewers, and approvals?

Momentum beats perfection

A clean ERP is nice. A publishable, defensible EPD that helps win specs is better. Treat the ERP migration as a background fact, not a blockade. With a fixed reference year, a crisp minimum dataset, and a visible gap register, the project keeps moving and the organization definately feels the progress.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which data should manufacturers prioritize for an LCA during an ERP migration?

Focus on plant energy by carrier, production volumes, core BOMs, inbound transport assumptions, and waste handling. These inputs drive most impacts in A1 to A3 and are fastest to source outside ERP when needed.

Can we publish an EPD if the PCR expires during our ERP rollout?

Yes. PCRs expire on their own cycle, but existing EPDs remain valid. The next renewal must use the updated PCR that applies at that time.

Does waiting for ERP stabilization improve EPD quality?

Not usually. You can lock a reference year now, document gaps, and replace proxies as systems settle. This keeps commercial benefits on track while preserving auditability.

How long are EPDs typically valid, and why does that matter in migrations?

Five years is common among major program operators, which allows teams to correct temporary proxies at renewal without losing ground (EPD International, 2024).