GreenDelta’s LCA and EPD services, explained

Who GreenDelta is

GreenDelta is a Berlin‑based sustainability consultancy and software developer behind the open‑source LCA ecosystem openLCA. Their site positions them as a full‑scope shop spanning advisory, research, data engineering, and tooling for life cycle and circularity topics. See About and portfolio pages for orientation: About us and What we do.

Services manufacturers can expect

Public pages list classic LCA consulting, critical reviews to ISO 14040/44, and training, with a focus on product‑level assessments and reporting. Start points: Consultancy and their data engineering offer, Data. For construction, they publish practitioner guidance such as a Module D whitepaper for EN 15804 contexts, useful when planning scenarios and cut‑offs: Module D whitepaper.

EPD creation and PCR guidance

While not marketed with a single “EPD services” landing page, GreenDelta’s project library shows hands‑on EPD development, including tooling for sector EPDs and interaction with program operators. The easyEPD initiative details auto‑generation of EPDs for sawmills with a semi‑automated verification pathway at IBU: easyEPD. Their German portfolio language also mentions creating EPDs and developing PCRs aligned to EN 15804, signaling capability for rulebook work as well as practitioner modeling. In short, they appear able to guide PCR selection, prepare LCA models and background reports, and support you through verification.

Data collection approach and typical workflow

Expect a consultant‑led rhythm. It usually starts with a scoping workshop, followed by structured data requests for a defined reference year. You will likely see spreadsheet templates for utilities, bills of materials, packaging, yields, and outbound transport, then targeted interviews to close gaps. Iterations follow to test sensitivities and align with the chosen PCR. This path is robust but can be effortful for plant and product teams. Many manufacturers now prefer lower‑friction data intake and tighter loops that keep calendars moving faster, so use that expectation when setting service levels.

Tools and software in their orbit

Tooling is a hallmark. GreenDelta develops and maintains parts of the openLCA stack and adjacent apps, including:

• openLCA core and plugins, plus an EPD editor aligned to ISO 14025 and EN 15804, and specialized methods like IMPACT World+: Software overview and IMPACT World+ in openLCA.
• Collaboration infrastructure for shared modeling and dataset governance: LCA Collaboration Server.
• Nexus, a marketplace and repository for LCA data and case studies: openLCA Nexus.

For manufacturers, the practical takeaway is that GreenDelta will be comfortable building models directly in openLCA, tailoring data flows, and setting up collaboration spaces when several plants and stakeholders are involved.

Verification and timelines with program operators

If you plan to publish in Europe under IBU, budget time and a verifier queue. IBU states verification takes several weeks depending on product complexity, data quality, and corrections, and that EPDs are typically valid for five years after publication (IBU, 2025) (IBU, 2025). IBU also announced that the one‑time verification fee will be adjusted from €2,000 to €2,700 for EPDs submitted on or after September 1, 2025, reflecting market‑wide verifier scarcity and demand growth (IBU, 2025) (IBU, 2025). These operator‑side facts shape project plans regardless of who performs the LCA.

Industries and geographies they appear to serve

Based on their project summaries and hiring notes, GreenDelta works across construction and building products, metals and forming, windows and glazing, energy systems including hydrogen and HVDC networks, bio‑based fuels, and electronics. Examples that illustrate range include NOCARBforging for a forming industry PCF tool, Hi‑BITS for PV, and EasyDC for HVDC cable systems: NOCARBforging, Hi‑BITS, EasyDC‑FOS. Their footprint is European with activity noted in North American projects as well, anchored from Berlin: Senior consultant posting.

What the client experience usually looks like

Manufacturers should plan for classic consulting mechanics. That means upfront scoping, recurring working sessions, and structured questionnaires for each plant. Data homes are often spreadsheets and utility exports with occasional MES or ERP pulls, then model buildout and review cycles. Internal lift is real. The upside is flexibility for edge cases and custom scenarios. The tradeoff is calendar time and coordination overhead.

How this compares to modern expectations

The market is steadily shifting toward low‑friction data intake, pre‑mapped templates to common PCRs, and faster iteration. Teams now expect clearer day‑by‑day project plans, fewer ad hoc spreadsheets, real‑time status, and sharper handoffs into operator verification. Use these expectations as a lens when you evaluate any proposal, GreenDelta included.

Questions to bring into scoping

• Which PCR and operator are you proposing for each product family, and why that choice now rather than in six months if a revision is pending
• What data schema and intake templates will you use, and how will you lower effort for plant teams
• How many review cycles are included before submission to the operator, and what is the path for changes after verifier feedback
• What plan do you propose to keep the EPD portfolio current across the five year validity window without re‑inventing models each time (IBU, 2025) (IBU, 2025)

Competitor landscape at a glance

Buyers typically compare three types of providers. Traditional LCA consultancies in the DACH and Nordics, boutique EPD specialists in the UK and Benelux, and larger software‑led platforms with in‑house experts. They differ on speed, ease of data intake, and how much burden stays with your team. Shortlist with those axes in mind rather than brand familiarity alone. And keep thier verification assumptions honest by cross‑checking against the operator’s current fee and scheduling notes.

The bottom line for manufacturers

GreenDelta brings a mix of LCA consulting and open‑source tooling that many engineering‑minded teams appreciate. If your products sit in construction supply chains, ask them to map work explicitly to EN 15804 scenarios, PCR updates, and the specific operator path you want to use. Then stress test the data plan, the review cadence, and the verification timeline. Do that, and the path from first data pull to published EPD reads less like bureaucracy and more like a well‑scored playbook.