Product-Specific EPDs for Resilient Flooring Under CARB
California’s embodied‑carbon program is moving from generic association EPDs to verified Type III declarations that pin GWP to a specific product and the plant that makes it. Resilient flooring sits squarely in the spotlight as draft CARB frameworks and CALGreen updates mature. Teams that wait for the final bell risk scramble. Here’s what “Type III, product‑specific, plant‑specific” really means, how scope will likely be judged, and the practical runway to get credible numbers in buyers’ hands before reporting clocks start.
What California is signaling
Draft CARB materials point to large commercial and multifamily projects disclosing product‑level global warming potential for in‑scope categories as the program phases in. CALGreen code workstreams have been aligning language so project teams can request verifiable, product‑specific EPDs rather than lean on sector averages. Translation for flooring suppliers: association EPDs help with education, but compliance and procurement confidence will hinge on declarations tied to the exact SKU and facility.
Regulatory text will evolve. The direction of travel is clear enough to plan against today without guessing exact thresholds.
Type III, product‑specific, plant‑specific explained
Type III means the EPD follows ISO 14025 and EN 15804 rules, is based on an independently verified LCA, and is program‑operator published. Product‑specific means the model reflects one defined product or family with consistent formulation and declared unit. Plant‑specific means the inventory uses real data from the manufacturing site supplying the job, not a pooled average across multiple factories.
Think of the PCR as the rulebook of Monopoly. Ignore it and the game falls apart. Follow it and your numbers are comparable and defensible.
Why industry‑wide EPDs become a liability
Industry‑wide or association EPDs often reflect averaged, conservative inputs. They educate the market and can be a bridge. Under a rule that asks for Type III product‑ and plant‑specific declarations, they rarely meet the letter of the ask. When buyers must report GWP per product, absent data forces them to apply conservative defaults that make bids look heavier on carbon than they are, which can quietly move a product out of contention.
If a product‑specific EPD exists beside an industry‑wide document, procurement will default to the specific one every time. Because it removes guesswork.
Win A $50 Amazon Gift Card in One Click!
Enter weekly raffle in one click • Help us get to know our readers and improve!
Timing realities and reporting windows
Standing up credible coverage takes calendar time. Data discovery, utility pulls, waste logs, transport mapping, and allocation choices come before the LCA math. External review and program‑operator publication add more time. Lead times are measured in weeks, not days. EPDs are typically valid for five years, which lets teams align refresh cycles with roadmap changes rather than chase one‑off updates.
If your volume peaks in multifamily, plan by shipment region and plant. If commercial TI is your core, map to the SKUs specifiers actually name in bid files. Then build the publication sequence in that order. Simple beats perfect.
How scope works for resilient flooring
Resilient flooring often blends polymers, plasticizers, fillers, glass or fiber scrims, and adhesives. That mix pushes it into the spotlight for embodied‑carbon rules that focus on plastic‑rich categories. Scope is likely to be defined by product type used in commercial and multifamily construction, not by consumer channels.
Expect project size and building type to influence reporting first, with smaller projects potentially entering later. Where a product spans manufactured housing, RV, and multifamily, assume the multifamily use case will pull the whole line into planning.
A lean plan to stand up coverage
- Confirm the right PCR and declared unit so results are comparable to peers.
- Select the program operator early to lock formatting and reviewer expectations.
- Inventory plants, formulations, and finish lines that ship to California.
- Build a clean data room for utilities, inputs, yields, scrap, and transport routes.
- Publish priority SKUs first, then expand to variants and secondary plants.
We prefer partners who remove friction in data collection so engineers can keep producing, while the documentation still ships on time. That white‑glove posture is what actually protects schedule.
Verification, operators, and digital deliverables
Third‑party review is the gate. Choose a recognized operator so the EPD is easy for design teams to trust and for code officials to accept. Ask for machine‑readable outputs so buyers can ingest GWP and meta‑data into procurement tools without copy‑paste.
If formulations differ by plant, publish plant‑resolved EPDs. If a single model truly represents multiple facilities, document representativeness and keep auditable evidence ready. Little details like consistent declared units and clear system boundaries save days of back‑and‑forth later.
What good looks like before the first reporting date
Coverage for top‑selling resilient SKUs, each with a Type III, product‑specific, plant‑specific EPD. Evidence that the PCR matches your competitive set. Digital files delivered in operator PDF plus structured format. A renewal calendar that aligns with product changes, not the other way round. And a playbook that lets sales point to a verifiable GWP number the moment a spec is on the table.
Do this and embodied‑carbon paperwork becomes a tailwind, not a tax. Miss it and teh scramble will set your schedule, not your strategy.
Frequently Asked Questions
What exactly qualifies as a Type III, product‑specific, plant‑specific EPD for resilient flooring under California’s evolving framework?
A Type III EPD follows ISO 14025 and EN 15804, is independently reviewed, and published by a recognized operator. Product‑specific means it models a defined product or family with a consistent formulation and declared unit. Plant‑specific means it uses inventory from the actual manufacturing site supplying the job, rather than an average across multiple sites.
Are industry‑wide EPDs acceptable for resilient flooring on California projects?
They are useful for education but are unlikely to satisfy reporting that calls for product‑ and plant‑specific Type III EPDs. Buyers facing disclosure rules often must apply conservative defaults when only generic data exists, which can disadvantage products lacking specific EPDs.
How far in advance should resilient flooring suppliers start EPD work?
Treat it as a weeks‑to‑months project depending on data availability and the number of SKUs and plants. Start with the highest‑volume SKUs and the plants shipping to California, then extend coverage. Align renewal timing with planned product changes so you do not refresh twice.
Which program operator should publish resilient flooring EPDs for California?
Use any recognized operator with strong construction market acceptance and a smooth verification process. Prioritize operators that support both PDF and machine‑readable formats so your numbers flow easily into buyer tools.
What if a flooring product ships from multiple plants with small formulation differences?
Publish plant‑resolved EPDs when differences are material to results. If one model represents multiple facilities, document representativeness clearly and keep evidence ready for audits and buyer questions.
About the Author
Eric works at the intersection of sustainability, regulation, and business strategy, helping manufacturers navigate the evolving landscape of EPDs and LCAs. Having spoken with hundreds of teams across North America, brings a deep understanding of what drives ROI, what regulators are asking for, and how companies can stay ahead with smart, scalable approaches to environmental reporting.
