PERI’s portfolio and the EPD coverage reality
PERI is a powerhouse in formwork, scaffolding and shoring with a catalog that reads like a contractor’s toolbox. Yet in a market where EPDs are increasingly the ticket to shortlist status, their public product‑level coverage appears thin while program operators report record growth in published EPDs (IBU, 2024) ([EPD International, 2025](https://www.environdec.com/about-us/international-epd-system)).


Who PERI is and what they sell
PERI builds and rents formwork systems, modular scaffolding, shoring towers, climbing and bridge solutions, aluminum and timber beams, plywood panels, safety gear, and jobsite services. They also offer digital planning and 3D concrete printing. It is a broad construction enablement portfolio rather than a single‑product play.
How many product families and SKUs
Across wall and slab formwork, PERI UP scaffolding lines, props, towers, and accessories, the active assortment likely runs into dozens of families and hundreds of SKUs. Regional variants and rental kits push that higher. Exact counts vary by country, which is typical for temporary works.
What we could verify about EPD coverage today
Scanning major European program operators and PERI’s own materials, we did not find product‑specific, third‑party verified EPD PDFs for flagship lines like PERI UP, MAXIMO, DUO, or MULTIPROP as of December 20, 2025. PERI does publish “carbon footprint” information and LCA‑style insights at product level, which signals internal work but is not the same as a Type III EPD under EN 15804 or ISO 14025 (PERI sustainability). If an EPD exists but is not openly listed, it will still be invisible to specifiers who search operator libraries.
Why this matters commercially
Public operator libraries are where architects, contractors, and LCA modelers look first. IBU alone published 533 individual EPDs in 2024 and reports 4,700 plus since 2012, a usage spike that mirrors market demand (IBU, 2024) (IBU, 2024). The International EPD System reports more than 18,000 published EPDs by mid 2025, showing how commonplace product‑level declarations have become in bids and databases (EPD International, 2025). When a product lacks an EPD, teams often model it with conservative defaults, which can nudge a spec toward an alternative that has one. You end up competing harder on price.
A likely gap that costs specs
PERI UP access and facade scaffolding are perennial best sellers. We could not locate a product‑specific EPD for PERI UP. Meanwhile, several EPDs for tubular scaffolding structures and metal boards are visible in major operator libraries, which means rivals can show verified numbers while PERI shows general carbon footprint pages. On projects where owners or GCs ask for Type III proof, that difference can decide who gets shortlisted.
Competitors PERI meets in the field
On formwork and shoring, PERI frequently faces Doka, MEVA, and RMD Kwikform. On scaffolding, Layher, Hünnebeck, and ULMA Construction appear often. In mixed packages, local rental specialists can substitute. Some of these players publish product EPDs for specific components in European programs, especially under EN 15804. That puts verified data one click away for specifiers.
What specifiers actually evaluate
Most teams care about three things. First, is the EPD product‑specific and verified. Second, is it aligned to the rulebook they use, typically EN 15804 A2 in Europe or ISO 21930 in North America. Third, is it easy to find in the operator’s library or the national portal they consult. If any link in that chain is missing, credibility drops. It sounds picky, but it is how modern procurement works.
A pragmatic publishing plan for PERI’s catalog
Start with one hero per family. For scaffolding, pick PERI UP decks and standards as discrete EPD units, plus a system‑level EPD if the PCR allows it. For formwork, start with MAXIMO and DUO panels, then beams and props. Align to the same PCRs competitors use to ensure comparability. Publish through an operator that your sales teams hear most in tenders, then enable dual listing as needed.
Timing and renewal
EPDs typically run five years under most program rules, so time the first wave to avoid renewing during peak bid seasons. If plant energy or material mixes shift materially, plan an interim update. Dont wait until a renewal cliff lands in Q4 when every team is slammed.
Sustainability signals PERI already sends
PERI reports 21 solar systems across 14 countries saving more than 3,000 tons of CO₂ annually and sourcing 100 percent green electricity for sites since 2021, which is solid corporate progress (PERI, 2025). Turning that momentum into product‑level EPDs is the lever that moves specifications.
Bottom line for manufacturers watching this market
Scaffolding and formwork are fast‑moving, logistics‑heavy categories. The brands that pair operational excellence with easy‑to‑find, program‑operator EPDs win more often in projects that prefer or require them. The lift to publish is finite, and the upside is persistent across bid cycles.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does publishing a product carbon footprint on my website replace a Type III EPD for tenders?
No. A product carbon footprint or internal LCA insight is useful, but most tenders and building LCA tools expect a third‑party verified Type III EPD aligned to EN 15804 or ISO 21930 and listed with a recognized program operator.
Which products in a scaffolding or formwork range should get an EPD first?
Prioritize high‑volume components that drive system mass and are commonly compared in bids, such as decks, standards, ledgers, main panels, props, and beams. Add a system‑level EPD if the PCR allows so specifiers can model the full kit.
Where do specifiers actually look for EPDs?
They search program operator libraries like IBU and the International EPD System, and national portals where applicable. If an EPD is not listed there, it is effectively invisible in many workflows.
Will temporary works EPDs matter for LEED v5 projects in the U.S.?
LEED generally focuses on permanently installed products. Still, many owners and GCs increasingly ask for EPDs across packages to standardize carbon accounting. Having them removes friction and helps avoid penalties from generic data.
