Program Operator Consortium, explained for manufacturers
If picking an EPD program operator feels like choosing a streaming service with too many bundles, you are not alone. The Program Operator Consortium sits in the background to reduce noise, harmonize rules, and make publication paths clearer so your team ships credible declarations without stalling product roadmaps.
What the POC actually is
The Program Operator Consortium is a collaboration among North American program operators intended to align how Product Category Rules are created, how LCAs are reviewed, and how EPDs are verified and published. It launched at Greenbuild 2015 with ASTM International, ICC Evaluation Service, NSF International, and Sustainable Minds (ASTM press release, 2015) (PR Newswire, 2015). Additional operators and affiliates participated in the following years, including SCS Global Services in 2016 (SCS Global Services, 2016) (SCS, 2016) and references from ICC-ES noting participation (ICC-ES, 2016) (ICC-ES, 2016).
Why a consortium matters to a spec-driven business
Think of the POC like a rules committee for a sport. It does not play the game for you, it keeps the field level so an EPD for your product can be compared fairly to competitors. For commercial teams, that translates to fewer reviewer do-overs, clearer expectations, and faster movement from LCA draft to a publishable, searchable declaration.
What it is not
The POC is not a single publishing portal or a certification badge. Program operators remain independent, with their own instructions, verifier networks, and portals. The consortium’s value is alignment, not centralization. That subtlety matters when sales asks “can we just upload it to the POC” and the answer is no.
POC and PCRs, in plain language
A PCR is the rulebook of Monopoly. Ignore it and the game falls apart. The POC encouraged consistent PCR structure and review mechanics across member operators, which reduces surprises later when your verifier checks allocation choices, cutoffs, or scenario modeling. That consistency is small on paper, big in time saved.
Verification models still differ
Operators can appoint independent verifiers, run in‑house reviewer pools for B2B declarations, or require external third parties for B2C. Those pathways exist with or without the consortium. For a busy manufacturer, the practical question is scheduling and throughput rather than philosophy. Ask how reviewers are assigned, typical queue times, and how conflicts are handled up front.
Win A $50 Amazon Gift Card in One Click!
Enter weekly raffle in one click • Help us get to know our readers and improve!
Picking an operator in a POC world
Use the consortium as a signpost, then choose on fit. Look for an operator that:
- Aligns with the core standard your buyers expect, typically ISO 21930 or EN 15804, and publishes in a directory your customers actually check.
- Offers verification capacity that matches your launch window, with transparent timelines and clear reviewer qualifications.
- Accepts the datasets and LCIs your LCA partner will use, including electricity mixes and transport models relevant to your plants.
A speed tip most teams miss
Decide your reference year and the likely PCR version during project kickoff. If a revision is imminent, confirm whether publishing under the current version is acceptable for your target bids and portals, or whether waiting is smarter. The POC’s harmonization helps here, but it does not replace a date‑driven publishing plan.
Will the POC guarantee comparability
No consortium can do that on its own, because comparability rests on standards conformance, quality of foreground data, and the specific PCR. What the POC improves is the predictability of the process so you spend less time chasing format tweaks and more time improving the numbers.
Quick playbook to exploit the POC’s benefits
- Scan recent EPDs in your category to identify common program operators and PCR choices.
- Ask shortlisted operators for their general program instructions, verifier assignment process, and current review lead times.
- Align your LCA modeling choices to the PCR early, including system boundaries and allocation. Prevention beats change orders.
- Plan for renewals. If the PCR is under revision, set a reminder to revisit datasets and scenarios in your next cycle.
Bottom line for manufacturers
The POC reduces friction between rulebooks, reviewers, and publication portals. That shows up as fewer loops, clearer expectations, and a cleaner path to an EPD buyers trust. It will not pick for you, and it will not fix weak data, but it will reward teams that prepare well. For specifer‑heavy markets, that edge is worth real revenue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the POC publish EPDs directly or act as a portal?
No. Member program operators publish EPDs in their own directories. The POC focuses on alignment of processes and guidance, not on being a central registry.
Is membership in the POC required for an operator to be credible?
No. Credibility comes from conformance to ISO 14025 and the relevant sector standards, plus robust independent verification. POC participation can signal alignment on PCR and review practices.
Will choosing a POC member speed up my EPD?
It can reduce rework because of clearer expectations, but total time still depends on your data readiness, verifier capacity, and PCR scope.
About the Author
With a passion for sustainability and a love for complex data, Toby helps manufacturers efficiently collect data from across their organization and get their EPDs done right. He’s especially interested in how AI can support human expertise, helping R&D and factory teams work faster, smarter, and with less friction.
