EPDs for Wall Finishes in the United States
Planning an Environmental Product Declaration for wall finishes, interior wall panels, or wallcoverings in 2026. Here is the definitive, numbers-first snapshot of who is publishing, which program operators dominate, the PCRs competitors pick, and when renewals will crowd calendars.
What “Wall Finishes” covers in this guide
Wall finishes here includes interior wall panels, wallcoverings, and related systems that finish the face of interior partitions. If your products are marketed as architectural wall panels, decorative wall cladding for interiors, or commercial wallcoverings, you are in the right place.
2026 snapshot at a glance
The United States market shows 78 currently valid EPDs for wall finishes across 10 manufacturers. Publication has been lumpy. Only 1 EPD appeared in 2021 and 2 in 2022. Activity surged in 2023 with 71 releases, followed by 4 in 2024 and none in 2025 so far.
EPDs issued per year
| Year | EPDs |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 |
| 2022 | 2 |
| 2023 | 71 |
| 2024 | 4 |
| 2025 | 0 |
The most recent EPD we see in this category is “Wallcoverings on cellulose fibre base” issued on Feb 29, 2024, by Global Integrated Flooring Solutions under UL, expiring Jan 17, 2029.
Who is publishing
One manufacturer dominates volume. Arktura accounts for 52 of the 78 EPDs, roughly 67 percent. Runners up include Knoll with 10 and a group of single digit contributors like BASALITE CONCRETE PRODUCTS, Formica, and Global Integrated Flooring Solutions. This concentration means the competitive bar for panels in certain subsegments is already set by a prolific publisher.
What this means commercially. If your wall system competes with panelized products, treat EPDs as table stakes rather than a nice to have. Sales teams can move faster when a product already appears in the registries buyers check during specs.
Win A $50 Amazon Gift Card in One Click!
Enter weekly raffle in one click • Help us get to know our readers and improve!
Program operators manufacturers are choosing
ASTM International leads with 53 EPDs issued for only 2 manufacturers. That is a high concentration and likely reflects portfolio scale. NSF International hosts 10 EPDs for a single manufacturer. EPD International AB shows 5 EPDs across 3 manufacturers, which signals broader adoption. SCS Global Services has 3 for 1 manufacturer. UL has 4 for 1 manufacturer. INIES lists 3 for 2 manufacturers.
How to read this. If multiple competitors in your niche publish with the same operator, matching that operator simplifies comparability for specifiers. If a single competitor floods one operator, you may still pick it for continuity or choose another operator that better aligns with your target markets and reviewer expectations. Parq publishes with the operator of your choice and manages the details so internal teams stay focused on the factory floor and product roadmap.
The PCR playbook for wall finishes in 2026
The most used rulebooks are operator specific Part B documents for interior wall panels. “Part B: Non-Metal Ceiling and Interior Wall Panel EPD Requirements” underpins 35 EPDs, and “Part B: Metal Ceiling and Interior Wall Panel System” supports 17. Core EN 15804 A2 frameworks appear as well, including 9 EPDs under EN 15804:2012+A2:2019 and 5 under PCR 2019:14 (EN 15804 A2). A small set uses national additions and a few carry unknown PCR tags.
What to do with this. If you manufacture composite or polymeric panels, the Non-Metal Part B is the common path. If you fabricate metal wall panels for interiors, the Metal Part B is the default. If your product is unconventional, an EN 15804 A2 core PCR can be a viable route while you confirm a best fit.
The timing window you should plan for
There is a pronounced expiry bulge coming in 2028. Seventy one of the 78 EPDs expire that year. Only 1 expires in 2026 and 2 expire in 2027. Four EPDs extend into 2029, and none currently reach 2030.
Why this matters. Renewal cycles for many panel makers will collide in 2028. Internal data collection, LCA modeling, third‑party review, and operator publishing queues will all get busy. Teams that start refreshing in 2026 avoid the crunch and can time releases around catalog updates rather than firefighting.
How often EPD consultants are involved
Sixty of the 78 EPDs, about 77 percent, list a third‑party EPD service provider. This is normal for complex multi‑site portfolios where collecting utility, production, and waste data would otherwise tie up engineers for weeks. If you prefer a white‑glove path, an EPD service provider like Parq handles the heavy lifting, from data chase to operator submissions, so sales can use the documents sooner.
Operator choice, simplified
If you want broad US recognition, ASTM, UL, NSF, and SCS all appear in competitor disclosures. If you plan global specs, EPD International AB and INIES surface in the data. Focus less on brand names and more on practicalities like reviewer availability, publication lead times, fees, and how quickly corrections are posted. We care about speed, ease, and quality, not just the logo on page one.
Picking the right PCR
Think of a PCR as the rulebook of Monopoly. Ignore it and the game falls apart. For wall finishes in the US, the two Part B documents for interior wall panels are the most common picks. EN 15804 A2 based core PCRs remain a reliable fallback if your exact subcategory is not covered yet. Watch the expiry dates on the PCRs that dominate your segment, since your next renewal must move to whatever updated version is current at that time.
A quick action plan for 2026
Start a light data warm‑up in Q1. Identify your reference year, sites, and billable meters for electricity and gas. In Q2, confirm your PCR and program operator. In Q3, model and review. In Q4, publish, then package the EPDs for sales enablement across bids and distributor portals. It is simple when each step is staged instead of rushed.
Notes on data quality and how to get help
Numbers in this article reflect the global public registry of EPDs that most architects and specifiers use. Due to normal loading delays, some late 2025 records may not be visible yet. If you want the full up‑to‑date background dataset or a sanity check on the best fit PCR for your products, connect with me on LinkedIn and send a message. I am happy to hop on a quick call, free, to map options and timelines. We will definitly keep it practical.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many valid EPDs exist for wall finishes in the United States over the last five years?
There are 78 currently valid EPDs for wall finishes across the last five years.
Which manufacturers published the most EPDs for wall finishes?
Arktura leads with 52. Knoll follows with 10. Several others contribute one to four each.
Which program operators are most used for wall finishes EPDs?
ASTM International hosts 53 EPDs for 2 manufacturers. NSF International hosts 10 for 1 manufacturer. EPD International AB, UL, SCS Global Services, and INIES have smaller counts.
Which PCRs are most common for wall finishes in the US?
The most common are operator Part B documents for interior wall panels: Non‑Metal (35 EPDs) and Metal (17 EPDs), followed by EN 15804 A2 core frameworks.
When do most wall finish EPDs expire and how should teams plan?
A large wave expires in 2028. Start renewals in 2026 to avoid bottlenecks and align updates with product launches.
How often do manufacturers use an EPD consultant or service provider?
About 77 percent of wall finish EPDs list a third‑party service provider, which helps manufacturers save time and reduce project risk.
About the Author
With a passion for sustainability and a love for complex data, Toby helps manufacturers efficiently collect data from across their organization and get their EPDs done right. He’s especially interested in how AI can support human expertise, helping R&D and factory teams work faster, smarter, and with less friction.
