EPDs for Textiles in the United States
Planning a first textile EPD or a portfolio refresh in 2026? Here is the clearest, data‑backed view of who is publishing, which program operators they use, and the PCRs winning real adoption in the United States. Use it to pick the right rulebook, avoid dead‑ends, and time your launch for maximum spec impact in 2026.
What counts as “textiles” in construction, really
Technical textiles show up where fabric meets performance: architectural membranes, roofing fabrics, geotextiles, reinforcement scrims, and acoustic fabrics. Carpet and modular flooring often use textile fibers, yet their EPDs usually live under Flooring rather than Textiles. That split matters for search, benchmarking, and competitive claims.
The 2026 snapshot by the numbers
Over the last five years, 5 product‑specific EPDs in Textiles are current in the United States. They come from 5 manufacturers and 4 program operators, supported by 4 named PCRs. The most recent addition landed on Oct 23, 2024.
Latest EPD sighting: Shelter‑Rite 8324 Architectural Fabric by FiberTite Roofing Systems, verified by ASTM International with an expiry of Oct 23, 2029.
EPDs issued per year
| Year | New EPDs |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 3 |
| 2024 | 2 |
| 2025 | 0 |
This is a small but telling sample size. The curve shows a first wave in 2023, then steady follow through in 2024.
Who is publishing: manufacturers to watch
Five distinct manufacturers hold the current set, each with one EPD: Darling Fibers, FORTA, FiberTite Roofing Systems, Knoll, and Solmax. The even distribution signals an early‑stage category where no single player dominates disclosure. That creates room to shape the narrative with a high‑quality first EPD instead of playing catch‑up.
Who is verifying: program operators in play
Program operator usage is diversified. ASTM International appears most with 2 EPDs across 2 manufacturers. EPD International AB, NSF International, and SCS Global Services each host 1 EPD. This spread means teams can choose an operator that fits procurement norms in their channels without looking like an outlier. Operator selection should follow the PCR fit and desired audience rather than brand familiarity.
Want the latest EPD news?
Follow us on LinkedIn to get relevant updates for your industry.
The rulebooks: PCRs used in the United States
Four named PCRs show up, plus one EPD filed with an unspecified PCR. The mix reflects how textile products bridge horizontal construction standards and niche technical scopes.
| PCR | EPDs | Latest expiry |
|---|---|---|
| EN 15804:2012+A2:2019 Core rules for construction products | 1 | Jul 1, 2028 |
| ISO 21930:2017 Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works | 1 | Sep 10, 2029 |
| PCR 2020:03 Man‑made fibres for textile sector (1.0.1) | 1 | Aug 31, 2028 |
| Part B: Requirements on the EPD for Technical Textiles | 1 | Jun 29, 2029 |
| Unspecified PCR | 1 | Oct 23, 2029 |
What this means for scoping: if your product behaves like a membrane or reinforcement, the Technical Textiles Part B is a practical path. For broader building contexts, ISO 21930 or EN 15804 A2 are well understood by specifiers. A solid EPD consultant will benchmark competitors and steer you toward the rulebook that maximizes comparability and credibility.
Renewal timing and the 2026 window
No textile EPDs in this set expire in 2026 or 2027. Two expire in 2028 and three in 2029. That gives 2026 a clean runway for first‑time publishers. Launch now, then plan your data refresh cadence around the 2028 to 2029 cluster to avoid overlapping renewals with competitors.
Spotlight on the latest EPD
Shelter‑Rite 8324 Architectural Fabric by FiberTite Roofing Systems is the most recent textile EPD in the United States, issued on Oct 23, 2024 with an expiry on Oct 23, 2029. It is hosted by ASTM International. For membrane and fabric roofs, this sets a practical reference point on operator choice and document structure.
EPD service providers matter in textiles
Four of the five current EPDs were prepared with an external EPD consultant or service provider. That level of involvement shows textile LCAs are data‑heavy and multidisciplinary, from resin and yarn to coating and lamination. An experienced partner like Parq can compress timelines by handling data wrangling across plants and suppliers while keeping quality tight, so engineering and operations stay focused on production.
Notably absent in this category, yet active elsewhere
Big brands that many teams associate with “textiles” do not appear in this Textiles snapshot because they typically publish under other categories.
Carpet and modular flooring leaders such as Interface, Shaw Contract, Mohawk Industries, Milliken, and Mannington Mills publish large EPD portfolios under Flooring. Their declarations often reference Part B: Flooring and use operators like UL, EPD International AB, or Smart EPD. If you compete with carpet or modular tile, check Flooring rather than Textiles when benchmarking.
Weather and building wrap is another example. DuPont’s Tyvek Air and Water Barrier System has current EPD coverage listed under Weather Barriers. Architectural fabric brands with strong US footprints, including Saint‑Gobain ADFORS, Serge Ferrari, and Vector Foiltec, frequently publish through European operators with EN 15804 A2 scopes. Those are valid references for US projects, yet they will not count toward this US Textiles tally.
The practical takeaway is simple. If a competitor seems “missing,” they probably filed under a neighboring category. Align your PCR choice with how the top alternatives disclose so buyers can compare apples to apples.
How to pick the right path in 2026
Start with the competitive set and intended spec pathway. If your bids land in roofing, façade, or acoustic packages, choose the PCR and operator those buyers already understand. Confirm your functional unit and declared unit early so the numbers remain comparable. Then set a clean reference year for utilities, materials, and scrap so your data story survives scrutiny.
We see teams move faster when they pick an EPD consultant early, assign one internal owner, and treat data collection like a short sprint. Dont let missing secondary data stall you. A good partner will plug gaps with vetted databases and document assumptions clearly.
Final notes and how to get the dataset
The data in this article comes from the global public registry of EPDs widely used by architects and specifiers. Due to normal posting and indexing lags, some late‑2025 EPDs may not be reflected yet. If you want the full, up‑to‑date background dataset or a quick read on the best‑fit PCR for your product, connect with me on LinkedIn and send a message. I am happy to hop on a short call, share the latest numbers, and help you map the fastest route to a credible textile EPD.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which program operators are most used for textile EPDs in the United States over the last five years?
ASTM International appears most with 2 EPDs across 2 manufacturers, while EPD International AB, NSF International, and SCS Global Services each host 1 EPD.
What are the most common PCRs used for textile EPDs in the United States?
Four named PCRs are in use: EN 15804:2012+A2:2019, ISO 21930:2017, PCR 2020:03 Man‑made fibres for textile sector (1.0.1), and Part B: Requirements on the EPD for Technical Textiles. One EPD lists an unspecified PCR.
When do most current textile EPDs expire?
None expire in 2026 or 2027. Two expire in 2028, and three expire in 2029.
Why are major carpet brands not listed under Textiles here?
Carpet and modular flooring EPDs are generally published under Flooring. Brands like Interface, Shaw Contract, Mohawk, Milliken, and Mannington Mills show strong EPD coverage there, not under Textiles.
Does using an EPD consultant speed up textile EPD publication?
Yes. Four of the five current textile EPDs were prepared with an external EPD service provider, reflecting the data complexity of textile supply chains. A partner like Parq can streamline data collection and keep quality high.
About the Author
With a passion for sustainability and a love for complex data, Toby helps manufacturers efficiently collect data from across their organization and get their EPDs done right. He’s especially interested in how AI can support human expertise, helping R&D and factory teams work faster, smarter, and with less friction.
