EPDs for Intumescent Coatings in Europe: The Data Guide
Here’s the 2026 state of play for intumescent fire resistive material in Europe. If you make intumescent coatings or “intumescent paint” for steel or wood, this is your competitive map, your renewal calendar, and your PCR playbook in one place.
What counts as “intumescent” in this guide
We include product‑specific EPDs for intumescent fire resistive material used on structural steel and timber. You might also see these marketed as intumescent coatings, intumescent paint, reactive coatings, or passive fire protection.
Snapshot of the market in numbers
As of Jan 21, 2026, Europe shows 13 currently valid EPDs in this category, produced by 6 manufacturers, through 3 program operators, across 3 distinct PCRs. The most recent issue in the last five years landed on Jan 26, 2024 for Envirograf’s “Intumescent Paint for Wood (HW System)” published with EPD Hub under “EPD Hub Core PCR v1.0, Feb 1, 2022,” expiring Jan 26, 2029. EPDs generally carry a five‑year validity window which shapes renewal timing (EPD International, 2024).
Release curve: who shipped when
A quiet start, one big wave, then a pause. The 2023 spike is the standout and 2025 shows zero, which often signals timing and registry lag rather than strategy.
| Year | EPDs issued |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 |
| 2022 | 1 |
| 2023 | 10 |
| 2024 | 1 |
| 2025 | 0 |
Who is publishing: manufacturers by share
Across the last five years, PPG Coatings leads with 7 EPDs. Promat SpA follows with 2. Envirograf, Hilti, Protega AB, and Siderise Insulation Limited each show 1. That concentration means one portfolio accounts for more than half of all current declarations, so competitors can still win visibility with a focused release plan.
Where they publish: program operators
Three operators handled activity in Europe. EPD International AB accounted for 10 EPDs from 3 manufacturers, signaling cross‑manufacturer adoption. EPD Hub carried 2 EPDs from 2 manufacturers, indicating newer but diversified use. IBU shows 1 EPD from 1 manufacturer, so coverage exists but is currently narrow. Each route is EN 15804 aligned, yet portfolio fit and timeline control often tip the choice.
Want the latest EPD news?
Follow us on LinkedIn to get relevant updates for your industry.
The rulebooks: PCRs that dominate this category
Think of PCRs as the Monopoly rulebook. Everyone plays the same game when they share a PCR. One PCR clearly led.
| PCR | EPDs | Latest expiry |
|---|---|---|
| PCR 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) version 1.3.3 | 10 | Nov 2, 2028 |
| EPD Hub Core PCR v1.0 (Feb 1, 2022) | 2 | Jan 26, 2029 |
| IBU Part B: Requirements on the EPD for Coatings with organic binders | 1 | Apr 10, 2026 |
The 2019:14 family is the default for most issuers here, with EPD Hub’s core PCR showing up as a small but growing path. The single IBU Part B entry is an outlier in 2026 timing.
Renewal risk and timing
Renewal clustering drives workload and re‑verification costs. The next five years look like this.
- 2026: 1 EPD reaches its end on Apr 10, 2026 under IBU Part B.
- 2027: 1 EPD hits Mar 21, 2027 under PCR 2019:14.
- 2028: 10 EPDs expire between Mar 29 and Nov 2, largely under PCR 2019:14, plus one EPD Hub item on Jul 11.
- 2029: 1 EPD on Jan 26 under EPD Hub Core PCR.
- 2030: no expiries.
If your competitor’s declarations cluster in 2028, a 2026 or early 2027 launch can steal the spotlight while others are heads‑down in renewal. EPD validity is typically five years in European programs which is why these clusters form (IBU, 2024).
What this means for commercial teams
Many bids now expect product‑specific EPDs as table stakes. Without one, project teams often assign conservative default impacts that make products less competitive on carbon scoring. An EPD lets the spec focus stay on performance and delivery. The price of producing one is often dwarfed by even a single mid‑sized project win.
Who actually develops these EPDs
Twelve of the 13 EPDs were produced with an EPD consultant or service provider involved. That 92 percent figure shows most manufacturers prefer expert help for data collection, LCA modeling, and operator submissions. If your internal bandwidth is tight, working with an EPD service provider like Parq removes the heavy lift so R&D and operations keep moving. It is definately the smoother path when release windows are short.
Notably absent manufacturers in 2026
Based on the public registry snapshot for MasterFormat 07 81 23 Intumescent Mastic Fireproofing, we do not see current Europe‑region EPDs for AkzoNobel, Jotun, Hempel, Sherwin‑Williams, Carboline, Sika, or Nullifire as of Jan 21, 2026. Some may be listed under adjacent categories or have expired entries. If you compete with them, there is room to stand out in specs this year by publishing first or refreshing early.
How to pick the right PCR for your next EPD
Start with the competitive set. Most intumescent EPDs in Europe used PCR 2019:14 version 1.3.3. Choosing that family supports like‑for‑like comparisons. EPD Hub’s Core PCR v1.0 and IBU’s Part B route exist, with different templates and reviewer pools. A good LCA partner will model sample results against the common PCRs and weigh fit against expiry timing.
Bring it all together
Intumescent coatings are a small but visible EPD niche in Europe. One portfolio dominates volumes, renewals bunch in 2028, and nearly all issuers used an EPD consultant. If you are planning a first release, aim to land before mid‑2027 to ride the quiet part of the cycle. If you are renewing, lock data collection early, especially where multi‑site utilities and resins add complexity.
I’m happy to share the full background dataset and talk through the best‑fit PCR for your products. Connect with me on LinkedIn and send a message. Quick calls welcome.
Note on data coverage: this analysis uses the global public registry of EPDs that most architects and specifiers rely on. Due to loading delays, some EPDs from the second half of 2025 may not appear yet.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which program operator handles most intumescent EPDs in Europe over the last five years?
EPD International AB handled the majority with 10 EPDs across 3 manufacturers, followed by EPD Hub with 2 and IBU with 1.
Which PCR should a new intumescent coating consider first in Europe?
Most competitors used PCR 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) version 1.3.3, so it is the most comparable starting point. EPD Hub Core PCR v1.0 is a secondary path and IBU Part B appears occasionally.
When do most current intumescent EPDs in Europe expire?
The expiries cluster in 2028, with 10 EPDs expiring between Mar 29 and Nov 2. One expires in 2026, one in 2027, and one in early 2029.
How common is it to use an external EPD consultant or service provider?
Very common in this category. 12 of 13 EPDs involved an external consultant or service provider, roughly 92 percent.
What if my competitors are absent from the registry today?
That is an opening. Publishing a product‑specific EPD can secure spec inclusion where default factors would otherwise penalize your product. Launching ahead of 2028 renewals is especially strategic.
About the Author
With a passion for sustainability and a love for complex data, Toby helps manufacturers efficiently collect data from across their organization and get their EPDs done right. He’s especially interested in how AI can support human expertise, helping R&D and factory teams work faster, smarter, and with less friction.
