EPDs for Doors and Frames in Europe, the data guide
Planning market entry or renewals in 2026? Here is the clearest snapshot of product‑specific EPDs for doors, frames, door sets, opening systems, and related hardware across Europe. We pull the numbers, flag PCR choices, and show where competitors publish so you can move fast and avoid rework.
Europe’s Doors and Frames EPDs in one 2026 snapshot
Doors and Frames in Europe shows 29 currently valid EPDs across the last five years from 15 manufacturers, published via 7 program operators and based on 9 different PCRs. The most recent issue we see is JANSEN AG’s “Janisol Primo” format, issued Nov 29, 2024 under IBU, expiring Nov 29, 2029.
Why this matters for commercial teams is simple. In many bids, products without a product‑specific EPD face a carbon accounting penalty, so they get sidelined before the price talk even starts.
Program operators, by share and behavior
EPD International AB hosts 14 EPDs across 7 manufacturers, a signal that multiple competitors find it acceptable for this category. IBU carries 6 EPDs across 3 manufacturers, strong in DACH and among system houses. Kiwa shows 5 EPDs but all from one manufacturer, which suggests depth for that client rather than broad market adoption. INIES, UL, EPD Norway, and ift Rosenheim each appear with single‑manufacturer footprints.
The takeaway for 2026 is pragmatic. If you want the broadest reference set for benchmarking Doors and Frames, EPD International AB and IBU are the two operator ecosystems you will most often be compared against.
Manufacturers visible to specifiers
Activity is distributed rather than dominated by a single player. Master Italy srl leads with 6 EPDs, followed by Bitus Latvia SIA with 5. JANSEN AG lists 3. dormakaba, Boero Bartolomeo, and Lyssand‑Frekhaug each show 2. A long tail of single‑EPD publishers includes VELUX, NorDan, NICOLL, Modus Sverige, Klein Ibérica, Severfield, Kastamonu Entegre, ALFALUM, and EFAFLEX.
For teams still on the fence, even one targeted EPD can unlock specifications where generic data would otherwise cut you out early.
PCRs that dominate, and what is next
Most declarations reference EN 15804+A2 core rules, sometimes via PCR 2019:14 and its c‑PCRs for windows and doors. EN 17213 appears as a product‑specific route for windows and pedestrian doorsets. Under A2, at least 13 environmental impact indicators are mandatory, which raises the comparability bar across brands (CEN, 2019).
The mix also includes “Unknown PCR” tagging in 10 EPDs. This usually points to metadata gaps in public listings rather than odd, bespoke rulebooks. If you are planning a 2026 release, align with widely used A2 pathways so reviewers and customers recognize the structure without friction.
PCRs in circulation, with latest expiries
| PCR | EPDs | Latest expiry |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown PCR | 10 | Nov 29, 2029 |
| PCR 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804+A2) (1.3.3) | 7 | Jul 28, 2028 |
| PCR 2019:14‑c‑PCR‑007 Windows and doors (EN 17213) | 3 | Mar 19, 2028 |
| PCR 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804:A2) | 2 | Dec 20, 2026 |
| Part B: Requirements on the EPD for Automatic doors, automatic gates, and revolving door systems | 2 | Aug 21, 2028 |
| NPCR 014: Part B for Windows and Doors | 1 | May 2, 2027 |
| PCR 2019:14 Construction products (EN 15804:A2) (1.2.5) | 1 | Mar 16, 2026 |
| c‑PCR‑006 Wood and wood‑based products for use in construction (EN 16485) | 1 | Feb 9, 2026 |
| Sustainability of construction works, NF EN 15804+A2 national addition | 1 | May 2, 2028 |
If your sales targets are in 2026 and 2027, prioritize PCRs with expiries in 2028 or later to avoid mid‑cycle revision work.
Issuance trend since 2021
| Year | EPDs issued |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8 |
| 2022 | 5 |
| 2023 | 11 |
| 2024 | 5 |
| 2025 | 0 |
The 2023 spike likely reflects teams catching up to A2 requirements after internal data readiness work in 2022, followed by a slower 2024 cadence. The gap in 2025 is visible in the public registry, which is consistent with uneven publishing pipelines late in the year.
Renewal clock, 2026 to 2030
Ten EPDs expire in 2026. Three more in 2027. Eleven in 2028. Five in 2029. None in 2030. Many renewal waves cluster on five year cycles, so plan resourcing before busy seasons hit.
For 2026 expiries, several are tied to general A2 PCRs and Part B rules for builders hardware. The larger 2028 wave includes six under PCR 2019:14 (1.3.3), two under c‑PCR‑007 Windows and doors, and two for automatic door systems. If you are competing in automatic doors or industrial openings, map those 2028 expiries to your bid calendar so you are not refreshing mid‑tender.
How often teams use an EPD consultant
Twenty of the 29 EPDs were developed with a third‑party EPD consultant or service provider, roughly 69 percent. This mirrors what we see in practice, since specialist partners shorten the data chase across plants and suppliers. If you want a high‑confidence path, consider an experienced EPD service provider like Parq that handles data collection and project management end to end so your engineers can focus on production.
Notably absent in the public registry snapshot
Some well‑known European brands do not appear with current Doors and Frames listings in the global public registry snapshot used here as of Jan 20, 2026. Internorm and VEKA did not surface in our search. GEZE also did not appear. They may publish in national databases, list under different product families, or have in‑house documentation not mirrored in the public registry. If any of these are key rivals in your segment, verify locally and decide whether an early EPD can create daylight in tenders.
Operator selection, made practical for 2026
If you sell across multiple EU markets, IBU and EPD International AB offer the most familiar templates for reviewers and specifiers. If your portfolio is heavy on automatic or industrial doors, check operator experience with those Part B rules and with ift Rosenheim. If France is core, factor INIES alignment and the NF EN 15804+A2 national addition. Publication venue is not a silver bullet, but misalignment can cost months you simply cannot afford.
Why this matters more in 2026
CSRD expands mandatory sustainability reporting to about 50,000 companies in the EU, which increases internal demand for auditable product data that flows into building assessments and customer reporting (European Commission, 2024) (European Commission, 2024). EPDs are not a cure‑all, yet they give sales and technical teams a common, verifiable language with procurement and design teams. That saves cycles and, frankly, wins specs.
What to do next
Pick your target PCR based on what leading competitors use, your operator preference, and expiry runway. Confirm any “Unknown PCR” peers so your comparators are apples to apples. Decide if you will include modules beyond A1 to A3 because those choices affect results and review scope under EN 15804+A2 (CEN, 2019). Then lock a timeline with your EPD service provider to avoid stop‑start projects that bleed time.
If you want the underlying dataset for this article or a quick sanity check on the best‑fit PCR for your next EPD, connect with me on LinkedIn and send a note. I am happy to hop on a short call and share the full, up‑to‑date cut.
Small but useful caveat. The figures above are based on the global public registry most architects and specifiers rely on, and at times the last half of 2025 may not be fully loaded yet. If something looks off, ping me and we will pull the freshest records together. It is definately worth ten minutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main program operator used for Doors and Frames EPDs in Europe and does it indicate market preference?
EPD International AB hosts 14 EPDs across 7 manufacturers, while IBU hosts 6 across 3. This suggests both are widely accepted, with EPD International AB slightly more diversified among manufacturers in this snapshot.
Which PCRs should a door manufacturer prefer in 2026 to avoid near‑term rework?
PCR 2019:14 (EN 15804+A2) version 1.3.3 and c‑PCR‑007 Windows and doors show later expiries in 2028. Choosing these reduces renewal pressure compared to PCR lines expiring in 2026.
How many Doors and Frames EPDs used consultants or service providers rather than being developed entirely in‑house?
20 of 29, roughly 69 percent, were developed with an external EPD consultant or service provider.
When will the next big renewal wave hit in this category?
The largest upcoming cluster is in 2028 with 11 expiries, followed by 2026 with 10 and 2029 with 5. Plan resourcing early.
About the Author
With a passion for sustainability and a love for complex data, Toby helps manufacturers efficiently collect data from across their organization and get their EPDs done right. He’s especially interested in how AI can support human expertise, helping R&D and factory teams work faster, smarter, and with less friction.
